| Literature DB >> 26114863 |
Mizuki Takemoto1, Hideaki E Kato1, Michio Koyama1, Jumpei Ito2, Motoshi Kamiya3, Shigehiko Hayashi3, Andrés D Maturana2, Karl Deisseroth4, Ryuichiro Ishitani1, Osamu Nureki1.
Abstract
Channelrhodopsin (ChR) is a light-gated cation channel that responds to blue light. Since ChR can be readily expressed in specific neurons to precisely control their activities by light, it has become a powerful tool in neuroscience. Although the recently solved crystal structure of a chimeric ChR, C1C2, provided the structural basis for ChR, our understanding of the molecular mechanism of ChR still remains limited. Here we performed electrophysiological anaEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26114863 PMCID: PMC4482709 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The two constrictions observed in the crystal structure of C1C2.
The two constrictions in the crystal structure of C1C2 (PDB ID 3UG9) and the electrophysiological analysis of the constrictions. (A) Overall structure of C1C2, viewed parallel to the membrane with the three key regions highlighted (magenta, blue, and red). The dashed area represents the putative ion-conducting pathway. (B) Magnified views of the highlighted regions in (A). Black dashed lines are hydrogen bonds, and orange dashed circles represent the putative conducting pathway.
Fig 2Electrophysiological analysis for C1C2 variants.
(A) The peak amplitudes of the photocurrents, normalized by the cell’s input capacitance. (B) Conforcal images of representative HEK293 cells expressing the C1C2 WT and its mutants. Scale bar represents 30 μm. (C) The expression level of each C1C2 variant measured by the membrane/cytosol ratio of GFP fluorescence. (D-G) The current-voltage (I-V) relation curves for each mutant. (H, I) The kinetic parameters for each mutant, (H) opening rates (τon) and (I) closing rates (τoff). The error bars represent s.e.m. of 3 experiments (n = 5–17 cells). * p < 0.05.
Simulation systems used in this research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ATR | p | p | 150 ns |
|
| ATR | Δp | Δp | 150 ns |
|
| ATR | p | Δp | 150 ns |
|
| ATR | Δp | p | 150 ns |
|
| 13- | Δp | p | 150 ns |
The simulations performed in this research. In this table, “p” and “Δp” refer to protonated and deprotonated glutamate, respectively.
Fig 3Effects of deprotonation of both Glu122 and Glu129 in the ground state.
Structural comparison of the intracellular constrictions between the ATR-E122p-E129p and ATR-E122Δp-E129Δp simulations. (A) Overall structures of snapshots from the last frame of both simulations. Key residues are highlighted in orange and magenta. (B) Magnified view of the intracellular and central constrictions (left and right panels, respectively). Double arrows indicate the possible motions of Glu121-Arg307 (red), Glu122-His173 (cyan), Glu122-Arg307 (green) and Glu129-Asn297 (magenta). (C-F) Distances between (C) Glu121-Arg307, (D) Glu122-His173, (E) Glu122-Arg307, and (F) Glu129-Asn297. (G, H) Distribution of water molecules in the (G) ATR-E122p-E129p and (H) ATR-E122Δp-E129Δp simulations. The distribution maps are contoured at the probability density of 0.0015 molecules Å-3 ns-1. The time-averaged structure of the protein over 150 ns is shown.
Fig 4Effects of the deprotonation of either Glu122 or Glu129 in the ground state.
(A, B, C) Distances between (A) Glu129-Asn297, (B) Glu122-His273 and (C) Glu122-Arg307 in the ATR-E122p-E129Δp and ATR-E122Δp-E129p simulations. (D, E) Distributions of water molecules in the ATR-E122p-E129Δp and ATR-E122Δp-E129p simulations. The distribution map is contoured at the probability density of 0.0015 molecules Å-3 ns-1. The time-averaged structure of the protein over 150 ns is shown.
Fig 5The conformational change in Trp262 upon retinal isomerization.
(A) Structural comparison between the snapshots from the ATR-bound (grey) and 13-cisR-bound (green) simulations. (B) Magnified view of retinal and Trp262, from the orange-highlighted region in the left panel. Double arrows indicate the possible motions of Trp262. (C) The RMSD values of the Trp262 atoms, relative to those of the crystal structure. (D) The peak amplitudes of the photocurrents, normalized by the cell’s input capacitance. (E) Conforcal images of representative HEK293 cells expressing the C1C2 WT and W262A mutants. Scale bar represents 30 μm. (F) The expression level of W262A mutant measured by the membrane/cytosol ratio of GFP fluorescence. The error bars represent s.e.m. of 3 experiments (n = 5–17 cells). * p < 0.05.
Fig 6The movements of TM helices upon retinal isomerization.
(A) Structural comparison between the snapshots from the ATR-bound (grey) and 13-cisR-bound (green) simulations. (B) Magnified cytoplasmic view of the red-highlighted region in the left panel. (C-E) The RMSD values of (C) TM6, (D) TM7 and (E) TM2, compared between the ATR-bound and 13-cisR-bound forms. (F) Distance between Glu121-Arg07 in the intracellular constriction.
Fig 7Correlation analysis for the 13-cisR-122Δp-129p simulation.
(A) The matrix of correlation coefficients for the pairs of Cα atoms. (B) Mapping of the correlation coefficients to the structure. The black dashed circle represents the pair of Cα atoms with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.7. The red dashed circle represents the pair of Cα atoms in TM2 and TM7 that has a negative correlation coefficient.