Literature DB >> 26109917

Effects of remedies made in patient setup process on residual setup errors and margins in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Mika Kapanen1, Marko Laaksomaa2, Tapio Tulijoki2, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen3, Simo Hyödynmaa4.   

Abstract

AIM: Patient setup errors were aimed to be reduced in radiotherapy (RT) of head-and-neck (H&N) cancer. Some remedies in patient setup procedure were proposed for this purpose.
BACKGROUND: RT of H&N cancer has challenges due to patient rotation and flexible anatomy. Residual position errors occurring in treatment situation and required setup margins were estimated for relevant bony landmarks after the remedies made in setup process and compared with previous results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The formation process for thermoplastic masks was improved. Also image matching was harmonized to the vertebrae in the middle of the target and a 5 mm threshold was introduced for immediate correction of systematic errors of the landmarks. After the remedies, residual position errors of bony landmarks were retrospectively determined from 748 orthogonal X-ray images of 40 H&N cancer patients. The landmarks were the vertebrae C1-2, C5-7, the occiput bone and the mandible. The errors include contributions from patient rotation, flexible anatomy and inter-observer variation in image matching. Setup margins (3D) were calculated with the Van Herk formula.
RESULTS: Systematic residual errors of the landmarks were reduced maximally by 49.8% (p ≤ 0.05) and the margins by 3.1 mm after the remedies. With daily image guidance the setup margins of the landmarks were within 4.4 mm, but larger margins of 6.4 mm were required for the mandible.
CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable decrease in the residual errors of the bony landmarks and setup margins were achieved through the remedies made in the setup process. The importance of quality assurance of the setup process was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Image guidance; Patient setup; Radiotherapy; Setup margins

Year:  2015        PMID: 26109917      PMCID: PMC4477121          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  12 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Does IGRT ensure target dose coverage of head and neck IMRT patients?

Authors:  Pierre Graff; Weigang Hu; Sue S Yom; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lifei Zhang; Adam S Garden; Justin Lo; K Kian Ang; Anesa Ahamad; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Mark S Chambers; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Systematic measurements of whole-body imaging dose distributions in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Roger A Halg; Jurgen Besserer; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A methodology to determine margins by EPID measurements of patient setup variation and motion as applied to immobilization devices.

Authors:  Joann I Prisciandaro; Christina M Frechette; Michael G Herman; Paul D Brown; Yolanda I Garces; Robert L Foote
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure.

Authors:  George X Ding; Charles W Coffey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Correction strategies to manage deformations in head-and-neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simon van Kranen; Suzanne van Beek; Angelo Mencarelli; Coen Rasch; Marcel van Herk; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?

Authors:  F Houghton; R J Benson; G S J Tudor; J Fairfoul; J Gemmill; J C Dean; D S Routsis; S J Jefferies; N G Burnet
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance.

Authors:  Simon van Kranen; Suzanne van Beek; Coen Rasch; Marcel van Herk; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Estimation of adequate setup margins and threshold for position errors requiring immediate attention in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Marko Laaksomaa; Tapio Tulijoki; Seppo Peltola; Tuija Wigren; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of mechanical and geometric accuracy of two different image guidance systems in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; Anand Mambakam Ravindran; Emmanvelrajan James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-01-04

2.  Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Anjanappa; Malu Rafi; Saju Bhasi; Rejnish Kumar; Kainickal Cessal Thommachan; Tapesh Bhattacharya; Kunnambath Ramadas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  Utility of intraoral stents in external beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Doi; Masao Tanooka; Toshihisa Ishida; Kuniyasu Moridera; Kenji Ichimiya; Kazuo Tarutani; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Masayuki Fujiwara; Hiromitsu Kishimoto; Norihiko Kamikonya
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-05-08

4.  Prehabilitation for patient positioning: pelvic exercises assist in minimizing inter-fraction sacral slope variability during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lauren O'Loughlin; Alexander Lukez; Yunsheng Ma; Jennifer Baima; Janaki Moni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Comparison of Intrafractional Motion in Head and Neck Cancer Between Two Immobilization Methods During Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy by CyberKnife.

Authors:  Chen-Lin Kang; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Shan-Ho Chan; Shyh-Chang Liu; Jui-Chu Wang; Cheng-Hsiang Tsai; Kuan-Cho Liao; Fu-Min Fang; Liyun Chang; Chun-Chieh Huang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Setup uncertainties for inter-fractional head and neck cancer in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eun-Tae Park; Sung Kwang Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-19

7.  The effect of designing a rotational planning target volume on sparing pharyngeal constrictor muscles in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Mona Arbab; Huisi Ai; Gregory Bartlett; Benjamin Dawson; Mark Langer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.