Literature DB >> 20083316

Correction strategies to manage deformations in head-and-neck radiotherapy.

Simon van Kranen1, Suzanne van Beek, Angelo Mencarelli, Coen Rasch, Marcel van Herk, Jan-Jakob Sonke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To optimize couch shifts based on multiple region-of-interest (ROI) registrations and derive criteria for adaptive replanning for management of deformations in head-and-neck (H&N) cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight ROIs containing bony structures were defined on the planning-CT and individually registered to daily cone-beam CTs for 19 H&N cancer patients. Online couch shifts were retrospectively optimized to correct the mean setup error over all ROIs (mean correction) or to minimize the maximum error (MiniMax correction). Residual error distributions were analyzed for both methods. The number of measurements before adaptive-intervention and corresponding action-level were optimized.
RESULTS: Overall residual setup errors were smallest for the mean corrections, while MiniMax corrections reduced the largest errors. The percentage of fractions with residual errors >5 mm was 38% versus 19%. Reduction of deformations by single plan adaptation was most effective after eight fractions: systematic deformations reduced from 1.7 to 0.9 mm. Fifty percent of this reduction can already be achieved by replanning 1/3 of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Two correction methods based on multiple ROI registration were introduced to manage setup errors from deformations that either minimize overall geometrical uncertainties or maximum errors. Moreover, the registrations could be used to select patient with large deformations for replanning. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083316     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Dirk Verellen; Lien Van De Voorde; Bie de Ost; Geert De Kerf; Olivier Vanderveken; Carl Van Laer; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

2.  Radiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the latest research progress and clinical application.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Yong-Hua Yu; Yong Zhang; Wei Qu; Jia Li
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Effects of remedies made in patient setup process on residual setup errors and margins in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Marko Laaksomaa; Tapio Tulijoki; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Simo Hyödynmaa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Shrikant Balasaheb Mali
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-02-22

5.  Human-level comparable control volume mapping with a deep unsupervised-learning model for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xiaokun Liang; Maxime Bassenne; Dimitre H Hristov; Md Tauhidul Islam; Wei Zhao; Mengyu Jia; Zhicheng Zhang; Michael Gensheimer; Beth Beadle; Quynh Le; Lei Xing
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Yin; Ying Sun; Feng Chi; Jian-Lan Fang; Rui Guo; Xiao-Li Yu; Yan-Ping Mao; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Guo; Meng-Zhong Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Estimation of adequate setup margins and threshold for position errors requiring immediate attention in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Marko Laaksomaa; Tapio Tulijoki; Seppo Peltola; Tuija Wigren; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  The frequency of re-planning and its variability dependent on the modification of the re-planning criteria and IGRT correction strategy in head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Markus Stoll; Kristina Giske; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Eva Maria Stoiber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Analyzing human decisions in IGRT of head-and-neck cancer patients to teach image registration algorithms what experts know.

Authors:  Eva Maria Stoiber; Nina Bougatf; Hendrik Teske; Christian Bierstedt; Dieter Oetzel; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.