| Literature DB >> 26106444 |
Assem Barakat1, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Majid2, Saied M Soliman3, Yahia Nasser Mabkhot2, M Ali2, Hazem A Ghabbour4, Hoong-Kun Fun5, Abdul Wadood6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Keywords: Aldol product; Chalcone; DFT compution; PAAS; X-Ray
Year: 2015 PMID: 26106444 PMCID: PMC4477317 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-015-0112-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Scheme 1Preparation of the title compound 3
Fig. 1The ORTEP diagram of the final X-ray model of 3 with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 30 % probability level
The crystal and experimental data of compound 3
| Crystal data | |
|---|---|
| Chemical formula | C22H20O |
|
| 300.38 |
| Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, |
| Temperature (K) | 100 |
|
| 27.3605 (9), 7.8271 (3), 7.4710 (2) |
|
| 1599.94 (9) |
|
| 4 |
| Radiation type | Mo Kα |
| μ (mm − 1) | 0.07 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.67 × 0.27 × 0.16 |
| Data collection | |
| Diffractometer | BrukerAPEX-II D8 Venture diffractometer |
| Absorption correction | Multi-scan |
| SADABS V2012/1 (Bruker AXS Inc.) | |
| Tmin, Tmax | 0.94, 0.99 |
| No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ (I)] reflections | 38877, 4902, 4472 |
| Rint | 0.042 |
| Refinement | |
| R [F2 > 2σ (F2)], wR (F2), S | 0.041, 0.107, 1.05 |
| No. of reflections | 4902 |
| No. of parameters | 211 |
| No. of restraints | 1 |
| H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
| Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.39, −0.19 |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) of 3
| D—H · · · A | D—H | H · · · A | D · · · A | D—H · · · A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2—H2A · · · Cg2 | 0.9300 | 2.92 | 3.7101 (17) | 143 |
| C4—H4A · · · Cg1 | 0.9300 | 2.59 | 3.3807 (17) | 143 |
| C16—H16A · · · Cg1 | 0.9300 | 2.98 | 3.5506 (17) | 121 |
| C21—H21C · · · Cg2 | 0.9600 | 2.84 | 3.624 (2) | 140 |
| C22—H22B · · · Cg3 | 0.9600 | 2.83 | 3.754 (2) | 162 |
Symmetry code: (i) 1-X,1-Y,-1/2 + Z. (ii) 1/2-X,Y,1/2 + Z. (iii) 1/2-X,Y,-1/2 + Z
Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C3/C8–C10 ring, Cg2 is the centroid of the C3–C8 ring and Cg3 is the centroid of the C14–C19 ring. No significant hydrogen bonds were found
Fig. 2The crystal packing of 3
The calculated and experimental geometric parameters of the studied compound 3 using B3LYP/6–311G (d,p) method
| Parameter | Calc. | Exp | Parameter | Calc. | Exp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R (1–19) | 1.223 | 1.228 | A (4–6–7) | 122.5 | 121.7 |
| R (2–4) | 1.369 | 1.366 | A (4–6–15) | 118.6 | 119.2 |
| R (2–18) | 1.422 | 1.420 | A (7–6–15) | 118.9 | 119.1 |
| R (4–6) | 1.421 | 1.425 | A (6–7–8) | 118.8 | 119.7 |
| R (6–7) | 1.418 | 1.418 | A (6–7–9) | 120.8 | 120.7 |
| R (6–15) | 1.430 | 1.423 | A (6–15–13) | 119.0 | 119.0 |
| R (7–9) | 1.375 | 1.371 | A (6–15–16) | 119.0 | 118.9 |
| R (9–11) | 1.414 | 1.413 | A (7–9–11) | 120.4 | 120.3 |
| R (11–13) | 1.374 | 1.374 | A (9–11–13) | 120.2 | 120.4 |
| R (13–15) | 1.419 | 1.421 | A (11–13–15) | 120.8 | 120.5 |
| R (15–16) | 1.418 | 1.420 | A (13–15–16) | 122.1 | 122.1 |
| R (16–18) | 1.380 | 1.378 | A (15–16–18) | 121.3 | 120.7 |
| R (18–19) | 1.502 | 1.499 | A (16–18–19) | 122.9 | 122.6 |
| R (19–20) | 1.484 | 1.477 | A (18–19–20) | 121.7 | 121.0 |
| R (20–22) | 1.345 | 1.342 | A (20–22–24) | 128.3 | 128.4 |
| R (22–24) | 1.472 | 1.469 | A (22–24–25) | 123.5 | 123.6 |
| R (24–25) | 1.416 | 1.415 | A (22–24–31) | 117.5 | 117.1 |
| R (24–31) | 1.420 | 1.416 | A (25–24–31) | 118.9 | 119.3 |
| R (25–26) | 1.398 | 1.398 | A (24–25–26) | 119.0 | 118.9 |
| R (25–32) | 1.512 | 1.510 | A (24–25–32) | 123.6 | 123.8 |
| R (26–28) | 1.392 | 1.391 | A (24–31–29) | 119.8 | 119.6 |
| R (28–29) | 1.396 | 1.392 | A (24–31–40) | 121.5 | 121.7 |
| R (28–36) | 1.508 | 1.508 | A (26–25–32) | 117.4 | 117.2 |
| R (29–31) | 1.391 | 1.393 | A (25–26–28) | 122.6 | 122.0 |
| R (31–40) | 1.512 | 1.513 | A (25–32–33) | 110.0 | 109.5 |
| A (1–19–20) | 118.8 | 119.8 | A (26–28–29) | 117.8 | 118.5 |
| A (4–2–18) | 120.7 | 120.7 | A (26–28–36) | 121.4 | 120.6 |
| A (2–4–5) | 120.2 | 119.8 | A (29–28–36) | 120.9 | 120.9 |
| A (2–4–6) | 121.0 | 120.5 | A (28–29–31) | 121.9 | 121.5 |
| A (2–18–16) | 119.3 | 120.0 | A (30–29–31) | 118.9 | 119.2 |
| A (2–18–19) | 117.6 | 117.2 | A (29–31–40) | 118.7 | 118.5 |
Fig. 3The optimized molecular structure of 3
Fig. 4Comparison between the calculated and experimental geometric parameters (bond distances and bond angles) of 3
The natural atomic charges calculated at the B3LYP/6–311G (d,p) method
| Atom | NAC | Atom | NAC |
|---|---|---|---|
| O1 | −0.5524 | H23 | 0.2043 |
| C2 | −0.1644 | C24 | −0.0997 |
| H3 | 0.2212 | C25 | 0.0298 |
| C4 | −0.1730 | C26 | −0.2169 |
| H5 | 0.2032 | H27 | 0.1961 |
| C6 | −0.0445 | C28 | 0.0140 |
| C7 | −0.1776 | C29 | −0.2200 |
| H8 | 0.2024 | C30 | 0.1960 |
| C9 | −0.1886 | C31 | 0.0310 |
| H10 | 0.2028 | C32 | −0.5901 |
| C11 | −0.1976 | H33 | 0.2026 |
| H12 | 0.2030 | H34 | 0.2084 |
| C13 | −0.1710 | H35 | 0.2171 |
| H14 | 0.2006 | C36 | −0.5829 |
| C15 | −0.0579 | H37 | 0.2024 |
| C16 | −0.1576 | H38 | 0.2055 |
| H17 | 0.2087 | H39 | 0.2096 |
| C18 | −0.1253 | C40 | −0.5897 |
| C19 | 0.5286 | H41 | 0.2047 |
| C20 | −0.2669 | H42 | 0.2083 |
| H21 | 0.2114 | H43 | 0.2063 |
| C22 | −0.1419 |
Fig. 5Molecular electrostatic potentials (MEP) mapped on the electron density surface calculated by the DFT/B3LYP
Fig. 6The ground state isodensity surface plots for the frontier molecular orbitals
Fig. 7The calculated (a) and experimental (b) electronic spectra of 3
Fig. 8The correlation graphs between calculated and experimental 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR chemical shifts of the 3
Fig. 9The experimental (lower) and calculated (upper) infrared spectra of the 3
The calculated and experimental wavenumbers of the studied compound 3
| Assignment | Calculated | Experimental |
|---|---|---|
| υ (CH, aromatic) | 3096–3046 | 3090–3030 |
| υ (=C20H21) | 3092 | 3090 |
| υ (=C22H23) | 3053 | |
| υ (CHasym, CH3) | 3011–2971 | 3016–2919 |
| υ (CHsym, CH3) | 2928–2922 | 2852 |
| υ (C=O) | 1649 | 1626 |
| υC20=C22 | 1614 | 1604 |
| υC=C (aromatic) | 1611–1489 | 1546–1500 |
| δCH in-plane methyl | 1466–1441 | 1469–1433 |
| δCH out-of-plane methyl | 1419–1396 | 1391 |
| δmethyl umbrella | 1373–1367 | 1365 |
| δCH aromatic in plane | 1362–1333, 1265–1116, 1008 | 1353, 1345, 1237–1130 |
| δ (=C-H in plane) | 1318, 1278 | 1299, 1290 |
| δCH aromatic out-of-plane | 967, 960, 937, 904–816, 765, 748–691 | 975, 960, 885–827, 760, 745–680 |
| δ (=C-H out-of-plane) | 995, 883 | 996, 885 |
| δmethyl rocking | 1049–1014 | 1070–1015 |
υ streching, δ bending
Fig. 10Correlation graph between the calculated and experimental vibrational frequencies of the studied compound
Fig. 11The TGA curve of 3
Fig. 12a The title compound 3 was fit well in the cavity of histone acetyltransferase enzyme. b Docking conformation of title compound 3 (generated by MOE docking software) properly accommodated into the binding cavity of histone acetyltransferase enzyme and developed hydrogen bond and two arene-cation and arene-arene interactions with active site residue Arg176, Arg124 and Trp180. histone acetyltransferase