Literature DB >> 33251562

Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.

Dirk Kerzel1, Stanislas Huynh Cong2.   

Abstract

Visual search may be disrupted by the presentation of salient, but irrelevant stimuli. To reduce the impact of salient distractors, attention may suppress their processing below baseline level. While there are many studies on the attentional suppression of distractors with features distinct from the target (e.g., a color distractor with a shape target), there is little and inconsistent evidence for attentional suppression with distractors sharing the target feature. In this study, distractor and target were temporally separated in a cue-target paradigm, where the cue was shown briefly before the target display. With target-matching cues, RTs were shorter when the cue appeared at the target location (valid cues) compared with when it appeared at a nontarget location (invalid cues). To induce attentional suppression, we presented the cue more frequently at one out of four possible target positions. We found that invalid cues appearing at the high-frequency cue position produced less interference than invalid cues appearing at a low-frequency cue position. Crucially, target processing was also impaired at the high-frequency cue position, providing strong evidence for attentional suppression of the cued location. Overall, attentional suppression of the frequent distractor location could be established through feature-based attention, suggesting that feature-based attention may guide attentional suppression just as it guides attentional enhancement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Attentional suppression; Statistical learning; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33251562      PMCID: PMC7875956          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02206-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  84 in total

Review 1.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

Review 3.  The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment.

Authors:  Radek Ptak
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Josef G Schönhammer; Anna Grubert; Dirk Kerzel; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber; Rachael E Gwinn; Yoolim Hong; Ryan J O'Toole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

7.  Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the PD with Small Search Displays.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Nicolas Burra
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Clare Press; Disa Sauter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2018-05-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Chiara Balbiani; Sarah Rosa; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.