| Literature DB >> 26095859 |
Jonathan R Weir-McCall1, Allan D Struthers2, Brian J Lipworth3, J Graeme Houston2.
Abstract
COPD is the second most common cause of pulmonary hypertension, and is a common complication of severe COPD with significant implications for both quality of life and mortality. However, the use of a rigid diagnostic threshold of a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of ≥25 mHg when considering the impact of the pulmonary vasculature on symptoms and disease is misleading. Even minimal exertion causes oxygen desaturation and elevations in mPAP, with right ventricular hypertrophy and dilatation present in patients with mild to moderate COPD with pressures below the threshold for diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. This has significant implications, with right ventricular dysfunction associated with poorer exercise capability and increased mortality independent of pulmonary function tests. The compliance of the pulmonary artery (PA) is a key component in decoupling the right ventricle from the pulmonary bed, allowing the right ventricle to work at maximum efficiency and protecting the microcirculation from large pressure gradients. PA stiffness increases with the severity of COPD, and correlates well with the presence of exercise induced pulmonary hypertension. A curvilinear relationship exists between PA distensibility and mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with marked loss of distensibility before a rapid rise in mPAP and PVR occurs with resultant right ventricular failure. This combination of features suggests PA stiffness as a promising biomarker for early detection of pulmonary vascular disease, and to play a role in right ventricular failure in COPD. Early detection would open this up as a potential therapeutic target before end stage arterial remodelling occurs.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic obstructive; Hypertension; Pulmonary; Pulmonary disease; Pulmonary heart disease; Vascular capacitance; Vascular resistance
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26095859 PMCID: PMC4646836 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Med ISSN: 0954-6111 Impact factor: 3.415
Fig. 1Calculation of EA:EES in the right ventricle and pulmonary artery. Ventricular end systolic pressure-volume is linear and characterised by the slope Ees and is generated by measuring pressure-volume loops under gradated preload and afterload conditions. Reproduced from Wang et al., 2011 [100]. Ea = Arterial elastance; Ees = Ventricular elastance.
Measures of arterial stiffness – Calculations, definitions and alternate means of assessment.
| Calculation | Definition | Method of assessment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local | |||
| Pulsatility (%) | (maxA – minA)/minA X 100 | Relative change in lumen area during the cardiac cycle | MRI Echocardiography IVUS |
| Compliance (mm2/mmHg) | (maxA – minA)/PP | Absolute change in lumen area for a given change in pressure | RHC plus MRI/Echo/IVUS |
| Distensibility (%/mmHg) | [(maxA – minA)/PP X minA] X 100 | Relative change in lumen area for a given change in pressure | RHC plus MRI/Echo/IVUS |
| Elastic modulus (mmHg) | PP X minA/(maxA – minA) | Pressure change driving a relative increase in lumen area | RHC plus MRI/Echo/IVUS |
| Stiffness index (N/A) | Ln(sPAP/dPAP)/[(maxA – minA)/minA] | Slope of the function between distending arterial pressure and arterial distension | RHC plus MRI/Echo/IVUS |
| Young's elastic modulus | [3(1 + minA/WCSA)]/Distensibility | Wall thickness for a given distensibility | RHC plus IVUS |
| Regional | |||
| Capacitance (mm3/mmHg) | SV/PP | Change in volume associated with a given change in pressure | RHC |
| PWV (ms−1) | Δd/Δt (TT technique) ΔQ/ΔA (Flow-area technique) | Speed of transmission of pressure wave | RHC MRI |
| Systemic | |||
| Elastance (mmHgml−1) | EA/EES = (ESP/SV)/(ESP/ESV-V0) | Change in pressure for a given change in volume | RHC with flow-volume loops |
A = area; d = distance; dPAP = diastolic pulmonary artery pressure; EA = Arterial elastance; Echo = echocardiography; EES = Ventricular elastance; IVUS = intravascular ultrasound; maxA = maximum cross sectional area; mina = minimum cross sectional area; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PP = pulse pressure; PWV = pulse wave velocity; Q = Flow over a single heart beat; RHC = right heart catheter; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure; SV = stroke volume; t = time; WCSA = Wall cross sectional area.
Summary of studies looking at invasive measurement of pulmonary arterial stiffness.
| Study | Population | No | Method | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milnor et al. | Mixed PH | 7 | RHC | Increased impedance in PH |
| Nakayama et al. | Mixed PH | 62 | RHC | Increased augmentation index and earlier inflection time in PH |
| Castelain et al. | Mixed PH | 14 | RHC | Increased augmentation index and earlier inflection time in PH |
| Mahapatra et al. | Mixed PH | 104 | RHC | Capacitance strongest predictor of mortality in PH. On multivariate analysis, capacitance was the only statistically significant predictor of mortality. |
| Hilde et al. | COPD | 98 | RHC | PA compliance greatly reduced in COPD Gold 2,3 and 4 |
| Hilde at al | COPD | 98 | RHC | PA compliance fell with exercise in patients with and without PH, with similar elevations in mPAP during exercise between the two groups. |
| Muthurangu et al. | IPAH | 17 | RHC with MRI | Inverse relationship between compliance and PVRI and mPAP. A fall in compliance was evident in 7/17 following nitric oxide inhalation |
| Kuehne et al. | Mixed | 12 | RHC with MRI | Increased elastance in PH, with resultant ventriculo-arterial uncoupling |
| Kopec et al. | IPAH | 26 | RHC with IVUS | PWV high in IPAH (mean PWV 10 ms−1) with excellent correlation with compliance (β = −0.81) and reasonable correlation with mPAP (β = 0.48) |
| Lau et al., 2012 | IPAH | 8 | RHC with IVUS | Increase in all measure of pulmonary arterial stiffness. Inverse curvilinear relationship between mPAP and compliance and distensibility. No change in PA stiffness following 6 months of bosentan therapy. |
| Rodes-Cabau et al. | IPAH | 20 | RHC with IVUS | Reduced pulsatility in PH, with reduced pulsatility predictive of future mortality. Epoprostenol infusion increased pulsatility by 53%. |
| Lau et al., 2014 | IPAH | 5 | RHC with IVUS | High PWV in IPAH (mean PWV 10.6 ms−1) with the reflected backward compression wave carrying 31% of the energy of the forward compression wave |
COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CoV = Coefficient of variation; EIPH = Exercise induced pulmonary hypertension; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; HV = Healthy volunteers; IPAH = Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; NYHA = New York heart association; PASP = Pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PH = Pulmonary hypertension; PWV = pulse wave velocity; QA = flow by area; TT = transition time; 6MWT = 6 min walking test.
Drawn from the same population.
Summary of studies looking at non-invasive measurement of pulmonary arterial stiffness.
| Study | Population | No | Method | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulsatility | ||||
| Bogren et al. | Mixed PH | 4 | MRI | Pulsatility 23% in HV and 8% in PH |
| Paz et al. | HV | 9 | MRI | No difference in pulsatility between the main pulmonary artery, right pulmonary artery and left pulmonary arteries. |
| Gan et al. | Suspected PH | 70 | MRI | Right pulmonary artery pulsatility showed a curvilinear relationship with mortality. Pulsatility <16% |
| Jardim et al. | IPAH | 19 | MRI | <10% pulsatility predicts non-responders to acute vasodilator testing with 100% sens and 56% spec. |
| Sanz et al. | Suspected PH | 59 | MRI | Pulsatility 41% in non-PH and 17.4% in PH. No difference in pulsatility between different causes of PH. |
| Sanz et al. | Suspected PH | 94 | MRI | No difference in pulsatility between group without PH and EIPH. Pulsatility <40% predicted PH with 93% sens. and 63% spec. |
| Kang et al. | Mixed PH | 35 | MRI | Pulsatility correlated with 6MWT (R2 = 0.61, p < 0.001)<20% pulsatility predicted poor function (6MWT <400m) with 82% sens. and 94% spec. |
| Stevens et al. | Suspected PH | 124 | MRI | Pulsatility correlates with right ventricular function |
| Stevens et al. | Suspected PH | 43 | MRI | Pulsatility correlated with exercise capacity while RHC pressures did not. |
| Swift et al. | Suspected PH | 134 | MRI | Pulsatility elevated even in very mild elevations in PVR. Pulsatility predicted mortality. |
| Revel et al. | Suspected PH | 45 | CT | Pulsatility of 16.5% predicted PH with sens 86% and spec 96%. |
| Pasierski et al. | Suspected PH | 19 | Echo | Pulsatility reduced in pulmonary hypertension with a linear relationship between pulsatility and PASP |
| Mahapatra et al. | Suspected PH | 54 | Echo | Capacitance was the strongest predictor of mortality including invasive pressure measurements |
| Ertan et al. | COPD | 54 | Echo | Right pulmonary artery pulsatility reduced in COPD patients, with significant differences between NYHA functional classes. |
| Liu et al. | COPD | 135 | MRI | Pulsatility falls with increasing severity of COPD, with a positive association with %predicted FEV1 and inversely correlated with %emphysema |
| PWV | ||||
| Peng et al. | HV | 17 | MRI | PWV 1.96 ± 0.27 with high intra-scan and inter-scan reproducibility (5.5% and −10.9% respectively) |
| Bradlow et al. | HV | 10 | MRI | No significant difference in PWV using the left or right pulmonary arteries. CoV 12% for both intra and inter-observer assessment. |
| Ibrahim et al. | Heterogeneous | 33 | MRI | PWV raised in pulmonary hypertension. Comparable measurements between TT and QA methods. |
COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CoV = Coefficient of variation; EIPH = Exercise induced pulmonary hypertension; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; HV = Healthy volunteers; IPAH = Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; NYHA = New York heart association; PASP = Pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PH = Pulmonary hypertension; PWV = pulse wave velocity; QA = flow by area; TT = transition time; 6MWT = 6 min walking test.
Drawn from the same population.
Different calculation for % pulsatility so not directly comparable to other studies.
Fig. 2Measurement of PWV using MRI: The location of the two phase contrast planes are delineated on the left image with the distance between them measured. The two separate waveforms are traced on the right relative to the triggering R-wave used to start image acquisition. The time between the waves arriving at the two consecutive locations can then be measured allowing calculation of the speed of the pulse wave.