AIMS: Pulmonary arterial compliance (C) is increasingly being recognized as an important contributor to right ventricular afterload, but for monitoring of treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) most often still only pulmonary vascular resistance (R) is used. We aimed at testing the hypothesis that R and C are coupled during treatment of PH and that substantial changes in both R and C would result in more haemodynamic improvement than changes in R alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analysed of two right-heart catheterizations of 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and 10 with chronic-thromboembolic PH. The product of R and C (= stroke volume over pulse pressure) did not change during therapy (P = 0.320), implying an inverse relationship. Changes in cardiac index correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with changes in R (R(2) = 0.37), better with changes in C (R(2) = 0.66), and best with changes in both (R(2) = 0.74). CONCLUSION: During therapy for PH, R and C remain inversely related. Therefore, changes in both R and C better explain changes in cardiac index than either of them alone. Not only resistance but also compliance plays a prominent role in PH especially in an early stage of the disease.
AIMS: Pulmonary arterial compliance (C) is increasingly being recognized as an important contributor to right ventricular afterload, but for monitoring of treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) most often still only pulmonary vascular resistance (R) is used. We aimed at testing the hypothesis that R and C are coupled during treatment of PH and that substantial changes in both R and C would result in more haemodynamic improvement than changes in R alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analysed of two right-heart catheterizations of 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and 10 with chronic-thromboembolic PH. The product of R and C (= stroke volume over pulse pressure) did not change during therapy (P = 0.320), implying an inverse relationship. Changes in cardiac index correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with changes in R (R(2) = 0.37), better with changes in C (R(2) = 0.66), and best with changes in both (R(2) = 0.74). CONCLUSION: During therapy for PH, R and C remain inversely related. Therefore, changes in both R and C better explain changes in cardiac index than either of them alone. Not only resistance but also compliance plays a prominent role in PH especially in an early stage of the disease.
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Aránzazu Campo; Stephen C Mathai; Jérôme Le Pavec; Ari L Zaiman; Laura K Hummers; Danielle Boyce; Traci Housten; Hunter C Champion; Noah Lechtzin; Fredrick M Wigley; Reda E Girgis; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Junjing Su; Alun D Hughes; Ulf Simonsen; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Kim H Parker; Luke S Howard; Soren Mellemkjaer Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alessandro Bellofiore; Eric Dinges; Robert Naeije; Hamorabi Mkrdichian; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Melissa Bailey; Michael J Cuttica; Ranya Sweis; James R Runo; Jon G Keevil; Christopher J Francois; Sanjiv J Shah; Naomi C Chesler Journal: Heart Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: James J Tolle; Aaron B Waxman; Teresa L Van Horn; Paul P Pappagianopoulos; David M Systrom Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690