OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging measurements related to pulmonary artery stiffness in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 134 patients with suspected PH underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and magnetic resonance imaging on a 1.5-T scanner within 2 days. Phase contrast imaging at the pulmonary artery trunk and cine cardiac views were acquired. Pulmonary artery area change (AC), relative AC (RAC), compliance (AC/pulse pressure from RHC), distensibility (RAC/pulse pressure from RHC), right ventricular functional indices, and right ventricular mass were all derived. Regression curve fitting identified the statistical model of best fit between RHC measurements and pulmonary artery stiffness indices. The diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of noninvasive AC and RAC were also assessed. RESULTS: The relationship between pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery RAC was best reflected by an inverse linear model. Patients with mild elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance (<4 Woods units) demonstrated reduced RAC (P = 0.02) and increased right ventricular mass index (P < 0.0001) without significant loss of right ventricular function (P = 0.17). At follow-up of 0 to 40 months, 18 patients with PH had died (16%). Analysis of Kaplan-Meier plots showed that both AC and RAC predicted mortality (log-rank test, P = 0.046 and P = 0.012, respectively). Area change and RAC were also predictors of mortality using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (P = 0.046 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary artery RAC is a marker sensitive to early increased vascular resistance in PH and is a predictor of adverse outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging measurements related to pulmonary artery stiffness in the evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 134 patients with suspected PH underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and magnetic resonance imaging on a 1.5-T scanner within 2 days. Phase contrast imaging at the pulmonary artery trunk and cine cardiac views were acquired. Pulmonary artery area change (AC), relative AC (RAC), compliance (AC/pulse pressure from RHC), distensibility (RAC/pulse pressure from RHC), right ventricular functional indices, and right ventricular mass were all derived. Regression curve fitting identified the statistical model of best fit between RHC measurements and pulmonary artery stiffness indices. The diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of noninvasive AC and RAC were also assessed. RESULTS: The relationship between pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary artery RAC was best reflected by an inverse linear model. Patients with mild elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance (<4 Woods units) demonstrated reduced RAC (P = 0.02) and increased right ventricular mass index (P < 0.0001) without significant loss of right ventricular function (P = 0.17). At follow-up of 0 to 40 months, 18 patients with PH had died (16%). Analysis of Kaplan-Meier plots showed that both AC and RAC predicted mortality (log-rank test, P = 0.046 and P = 0.012, respectively). Area change and RAC were also predictors of mortality using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (P = 0.046 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary artery RAC is a marker sensitive to early increased vascular resistance in PH and is a predictor of adverse outcome.
Authors: Michael Pienn; Gabor Kovacs; Maria Tscherner; Alexander Avian; Thorsten R Johnson; Peter Kullnig; Rudolf Stollberger; Andrea Olschewski; Horst Olschewski; Zoltán Bálint Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Bellofiore; J Henningsen; C G Lepak; L Tian; A Roldan-Alzate; H B Kellihan; D W Consigny; C J Francois; N C Chesler Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Richard M Friesen; Michal Schäfer; D Dunbar Ivy; Steven H Abman; Kurt Stenmark; Lorna P Browne; Alex J Barker; Kendall S Hunter; Uyen Truong Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jordan C Ray; Charles Burger; Patricia Mergo; Robert Safford; Joseph Blackshear; Christopher Austin; DeLisa Fairweather; Michael G Heckman; Tonya Zeiger; Marcia Dubin; Brian Shapiro Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Lian Tian; Heidi B Kellihan; Joseph Henningsen; Alessandro Bellofiore; Omid Forouzan; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Daniel W Consigny; McLean Gunderson; Seth H Dailey; Christopher J Francois; Naomi C Chesler Journal: J Biomech Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Hunter Mwansa; Kenneth C Bilchick; Alex M Parker; William Harding; Benjamin Ruth; Jamie L W Kennedy; Manu Mysore; Younghoon Kwon; Andrew Mihalek; Sula Mazimba Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Alessandro Bellofiore; Eric Dinges; Robert Naeije; Hamorabi Mkrdichian; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Melissa Bailey; Michael J Cuttica; Ranya Sweis; James R Runo; Jon G Keevil; Christopher J Francois; Sanjiv J Shah; Naomi C Chesler Journal: Heart Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 5.994