Literature DB >> 26089712

Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.

C Kaniklidis1.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID： 26089712      PMCID： PMC4462523          DOI： 10.3747/co.22.2584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN： 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten J Jørgensen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening.

Authors:  J A M Gray; J Patnick; R G Blanks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-01

Review 3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Counterpoint re: "Mammography screening-sticking to the science".

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Reflections on screening mammography and the early detection of breast cancer: A Countercurrents Series.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael Edward Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid; Peter Nelson; David F Ransohoff; H Gilbert Welch; Shelley Hwang; Donald A Berry; Kenneth W Kinzler; William C Black; Mina Bissell; Howard Parnes; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 41.316
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Response to: "Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective".

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Mammography, Martin Yaffe, and me: response and appreciation.

Authors:  Constantine Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.