Literature DB >> 26628886

Response to: "Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective".

Martin J Yaffe1.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID: 26628886      PMCID: PMC4608419          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Time to stop mammography screening?

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Implications of CISNET modeling on number needed to screen and mortality reduction with digital mammography in women 40-49 years old.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Mark A Helvie; Lara A Hardesty
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Overdiagnosing overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

5.  A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; R A Jong; M J Yaffe; D Tritchler; G Lockwood; C J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

Authors:  Mireille Broeders; Sue Moss; Lennarth Nyström; Sisse Njor; Håkan Jonsson; Ellen Paap; Nathalie Massat; Stephen Duffy; Elsebeth Lynge; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Population studies of the effectiveness of mammographic screening.

Authors:  Andrew Coldman; Norm Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Mammography, Martin Yaffe, and me: response and appreciation.

Authors:  Constantine Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Response to: "[Yaffe's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.