Literature DB >> 24450669

Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.

Daniel B Kopans1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the development of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to describe its advantages over 2D mammography for breast cancer screening.
CONCLUSION: Mammographic screening has dramatically reduced breast cancer deaths, but it does not depict all cancer early enough to result in a cure. In addition, because of the recall rates associated with mammography, efforts are underway to reduce access to screening. Use of DBT improves sensitivity and specificity, and there is no longer a need to obtain full-exposure 2D mammograms. DBT will replace standard 2D mammography for breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24450669     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary study on comparison with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and dedicated workstation.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Sung Ui Shin; Myung Eun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis].

Authors:  H Preibsch; K C Siegmann-Luz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bernhard B Zimmermann; Bin Deng; Bhawana Singh; Mark Martino; Juliette Selb; Qianqian Fang; Amir Y Sajjadi; Jayne Cormier; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas; Mansi A Saksena; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.

Authors:  David L Windt
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 7.  Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Arwa A Alzaghal; Pamela J DiPiro
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Cheung; Yu-Ching Lin; Yung-Liang Wan; Kee-Min Yeow; Pei-Chin Huang; Yung-Feng Lo; Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Chee-Jen Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.

Authors:  Susanne Wienbeck; Johannes Uhlig; Susanne Luftner-Nagel; Antonia Zapf; Alexey Surov; Eva von Fintel; Vera Stahnke; Joachim Lotz; Uwe Fischer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Cheung; Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Yung-Feng Lo; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Pei-Chin Huang; Shin-Chih Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.