Literature DB >> 26089713

Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

M J Yaffe1.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID： 26089713      PMCID： PMC4462524          DOI： 10.3747/co.22.2371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN： 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R E Hendrick; R A Smith; J H Rutledge; C R Smart
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

2.  The review of randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Is the debate over?

Authors:  N F Boyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Counterpoint: Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  re: Reflections on screening mammography and the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Re: "counterpoint: overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening".

Authors:  Anthony Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; R A Jong; M J Yaffe; D Tritchler; G Lockwood; C J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  R E Tarone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a Canadian critique.

Authors:  L J Burhenne; H J Burhenne
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Response to: "[Miller's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Investigating young women's motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nanon H M Labrie; Ramona Ludolph; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Mobile Phone Multilevel and Multimedia Messaging Intervention for Breast Cancer Screening: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hee Lee; Rahel Ghebre; Chap Le; Yoo Jeong Jang; Monica Sharratt; Douglas Yee
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.773
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.