Literature DB >> 26089714

Counterpoint re: "Mammography screening-sticking to the science".

S A Narod1.   

Abstract

Year:  2015        PMID： 26089714      PMCID： PMC4462525          DOI： 10.3747/co.22.2457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN： 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Response to: "Counterpoint re: 'Mammography screening-sticking to the science'".

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Through a glass darkly: the mammography debate.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Response to: "[Miller's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.