Literature DB >> 26089592

Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production.

Cassandra L Jacobs1, Loretta K Yiu1, Duane G Watson1, Gary S Dell1.   

Abstract

Acoustic reduction for repeated words could be the result of articulation and motor practice (Lam & Watson, 2014), facilitated production (Kahn & Arnold, 2015; Gahl et al., 2012), or audience design and shared common ground (Galati & Brennan, 2010). We sought to narrow down what kind of facilitation leads to repetition reduction. Repetition could, in principle, facilitate production on a conceptual, lexical, phonological, articulatory, or acoustic level (Kahn & Arnold, 2015). We compared the durations of the second utterance of a target word when the initial production was aloud or silent. The silent presentation either involved unmouthed or mouthed inner speech. Overt production, unmouthed and mouthed inner speech all led to reduction in target word onsets, but target word durations were only shortened when a word was initially said aloud. In an additional experiment, we found that prior naming of a homophone of the target word also led to duration reduction. The results suggest that repetition reduction occurs when there is a recently experienced auditory memory of the item. We propose that duration may be controlled in part by auditory feedback during production, the use of which can be primed by recent auditory experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  duration; homophones; inner speech; repetition priming

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089592      PMCID: PMC4467575          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  20 in total

1.  Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness.

Authors:  Boaz Keysar; Anne S Henly
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

2.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production.

Authors:  L R Wheeldon; S Monsell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

4.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

5.  If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Carla L Hudson Kam; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Decomposition of repetition priming components in picture naming.

Authors:  Wendy S Francis; Nuvia I Corral; Mary L Jones; Silvia P Sáenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-08

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.

Authors:  Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

9.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.

Authors:  Nicholas Epley; Boaz Keysar; Leaf Van Boven; Thomas Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-09

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Rhonda McClain; Emily Cibelli; Yossi Adi; Erin Gustafson; Cornelia Moers; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction.

Authors:  Cassandra L Jacobs; Torrey M Loucks; Duane G Watson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.842

4.  The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production.

Authors:  Erin Gustafson; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Dimensions of similarity in the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Melinda Fricke; Melissa M Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  The (in)dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production.

Authors:  Esteban Buz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

Authors:  Esteban Buz; Michael K Tanenhaus; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.