Literature DB >> 27375344

Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

Esteban Buz1, Michael K Tanenhaus2, T Florian Jaeger3.   

Abstract

We ask whether speakers can adapt their productions when feedback from their interlocutors suggests that previous productions were perceptually confusable. To address this question, we use a novel web-based task-oriented paradigm for speech recording, in which participants produce instructions towards a (simulated) partner with naturalistic response times. We manipulate (1) whether a target word with a voiceless plosive (e.g., pill) occurs in the presence of a voiced competitor (bill) or an unrelated word (food) and (2) whether or not the simulated partner occasionally misunderstands the target word. Speakers hyper-articulated the target word when a voiced competitor was present. Moreover, the size of the hyper-articulation effect was nearly doubled when partners occasionally misunderstood the instruction. A novel type of distributional analysis further suggests that hyper-articulation did not change the target of production, but rather reduced the probability of perceptually ambiguous or confusable productions. These results were obtained in the absence of explicit clarification requests, and persisted across words and over trials. Our findings suggest that speakers adapt their pronunciations based on the perceived communicative success of their previous productions in the current environment. We discuss why speakers make adaptive changes to their speech and what mechanisms might underlie speakers' ability to do so.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Hyper-articulation; Interlocutor feedback; Language production; Perceptual confusability

Year:  2016        PMID: 27375344      PMCID: PMC4927008          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  57 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.

Authors:  Calion B Lockridge; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Carla L Hudson Kam; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Pronouncing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking.

Authors:  J E Fox Tree; H H Clark
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-02

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The sequential curing effect in speech production.

Authors:  C A Sevald; G S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

8.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory.

Authors:  Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Intention in Articulation: Articulatory Timing in Alternating Consonant Sequences and Its Implications for Models of Speech Production.

Authors:  Pouplier Marianne; Louis Goldstein
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-04-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts.

Authors:  Scott Seyfarth; Esteban Buz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension.

Authors:  Caoimhe M Harrington Stack; Ariel N James; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

4.  Adjustment of cue weighting in speech by speakers and listeners: Evidence from amplitude and duration modifications of Mandarin Chinese tone.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Seth Wiener; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interactions between Lexical Access and Articulation.

Authors:  Angela Fink; Gary M Oppenheim; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Investigating the effects of phonological neighbors on word retrieval and phonetic variation in word naming and picture naming paradigms.

Authors:  Haoyun Zhang; Matthew T Carlson; Michele T Diaz
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Speaking with a KN95 face mask: a within-subjects study on speaker adaptation and strategies to improve intelligibility.

Authors:  Sarah E Gutz; Hannah P Rowe; Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky; Jordan R Green
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.