Literature DB >> 21156876

Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.

Tuan Q Lam1, Duane G Watson.   

Abstract

The repetition and the predictability of a word in a conversation are two factors that are believed to affect whether it is emphasized: predictable, repeated words are less acoustically prominent than unpredictable, new words. However, because predictability and repetition are correlated, it is unclear whether speakers lengthen unpredictable words to facilitate comprehension or whether this lengthening is the result of difficulties in accessing a new (nonrepeated) lexical item. In this study, we investigated the relationship between acoustic prominence, repetition, and predictability in a description task. In Experiment 1, we found that repeated referents are produced with reduced prominence, even when these referents are unexpected. In Experiment 2, we found that predictability and repetition both have independent effects on duration and intensity. However, word duration was primarily determined by repetition, and intensity was primarily determined by predictability. The results are most consistent with an account in which multiple cognitive factors influence the acoustic prominence of a word.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21156876      PMCID: PMC3057424          DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.

Authors:  Kristine H Onishi; Kyle E Chambers; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

2.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Tic Tac Toe: effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production.

Authors:  Duane G Watson; Jennifer E Arnold; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-13

5.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1988 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects.

Authors:  A Wingfield
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1968-06

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives listeners' comprehension.

Authors:  Angela M Isaacs; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody.

Authors:  Rachel E Baker; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  21 in total

1.  Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Jason M Kahn; Giulia C Pancani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Synthesizing meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration.

Authors:  Loretta K Yiu; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

5.  Mothers Consistently Alter Their Unique Vocal Fingerprints When Communicating with Infants.

Authors:  Elise A Piazza; Marius Cătălin Iordan; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Rhonda McClain; Emily Cibelli; Yossi Adi; Erin Gustafson; Cornelia Moers; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production.

Authors:  Erin Gustafson; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Repetition reduction: lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition.

Authors:  Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Reduction in Prosodic Prominence Predicts Speakers' Recall: Implications for Theories of Prosody.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Automatic analysis of slips of the tongue: Insights into the cognitive architecture of speech production.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Joseph Keshet; Erin Gustafson; Jordana Heller; Jeremy Needle
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.