Literature DB >> 17407776

Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Gary M Oppenheim1, Gary S Dell.   

Abstract

Inner speech, that little voice that people often hear inside their heads while thinking, is a form of mental imagery. The properties of inner speech errors can be used to investigate the nature of inner speech, just as overt slips are informative about overt speech production. Overt slips tend to create words (lexical bias) and involve similar exchanging phonemes (phonemic similarity effect). We examined these effects in inner and overt speech via a tongue-twister recitation task. While lexical bias was present in both inner and overt speech errors, the phonemic similarity effect was evident only for overt errors, producing a significant overtness by similarity interaction. We propose that inner speech is impoverished at lower (featural) levels, but robust at higher (phonemic) levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407776      PMCID: PMC2435259          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  12 in total

1.  Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.

Authors:  R J Hartsuiker; H H Kolk
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

4.  Spoonish spanerisms: A lexical bias effect in Spanish.

Authors:  Robert J Hartsuiker; Inés Antón-Méndez; Bjorn Roelstraete; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The lexical bias effect in bilingual speech production: evidence for feedback between lexical and sublexical levels across languages.

Authors:  Albert Costa; Bjorn Roelstraete; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

7.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech.

Authors:  D G MacKay
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

9.  Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.791

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Feature migration in time: reflection of selective attention on speech errors.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Now you see it ... and now again: semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Sabrina Aristei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  More attention when speaking: does it help or does it hurt?

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; John Houde; Feng Rong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Density pervades: an analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Phonetic detail and lateralization of reading-related inner speech and of auditory and somatosensory feedback processing during overt reading.

Authors:  Christian A Kell; Maritza Darquea; Marion Behrens; Lorenzo Cordani; Christian Keller; Susanne Fuchs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.