Literature DB >> 15298329

The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Matthew Aylett1, Alice Turk.   

Abstract

This paper explores two related factors which influence variation in duration, prosodic structure and redundancy in spontaneous speech. We argue that the constraint of producing robust communication while efficiently expending articulatory effort leads to an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration. The inverse relationship improves communication robustness by spreading information more evenly across the speech signal, yielding a smoother signal redundancy profile. We argue that prosodic prominence is a linguistic means of achieving smooth signal redundancy. Prosodic prominence increases syllable duration and coincides to a large extent with unpredictable sections of speech, and thus leads to a smoother signal redundancy. The results of linear regressions carried out between measures of redundancy, syllable duration and prosodic structure in a large corpus of spontaneous speech confirm: (1) an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration, and (2) a strong relationship between prosodic prominence and duration. The fact that a large proportion of the variance predicted by language redundancy and prosodic prominence is nonunique suggests that, in English, prosodic prominence structure is the means with which constraints caused by a robust signal requirement are expressed in spontaneous speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15298329     DOI: 10.1177/00238309040470010201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  69 in total

1.  Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Jason M Kahn; Giulia C Pancani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Seeking predictions from a predictive framework.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Victor Ferreira
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Information density and dependency length as complementary cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael Xavier Collins
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  Information structure: linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Elsi Kaiser; Jason M Kahn; Lucy K Kim
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-03-20

5.  A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory.

Authors:  James D Harnsberger; Richard Wright; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking.

Authors:  Maryia Fedzechkina; Elissa L Newport; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

7.  Word Durations in Non-Native English.

Authors:  Rachel E Baker; Melissa Baese-Berk; Laurent Bonnasse-Gahot; Midam Kim; Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-01-01

8.  Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication.

Authors:  Steven T Piantadosi; Harry Tily; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production.

Authors:  Erin Gustafson; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Interactions between Lexical Access and Articulation.

Authors:  Angela Fink; Gary M Oppenheim; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.