Literature DB >> 30024252

The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.

Matthew Goldrick1, Rhonda McClain2, Emily Cibelli1, Yossi Adi3, Erin Gustafson1, Cornelia Moers4, Joseph Keshet3.   

Abstract

Interactive models of language production predict that it should be possible to observe long-distance interactions; effects that arise at one level of processing influence multiple subsequent stages of representation and processing. We examine the hypothesis that disruptions arising in nonform-based levels of planning-specifically, lexical selection-should modulate articulatory processing. A novel automatic phonetic analysis method was used to examine productions in a paradigm yielding both general disruptions to formulation processes and, more specifically, overt errors during lexical selection. This analysis method allowed us to examine articulatory disruptions at multiple levels of analysis, from whole words to individual segments. Baseline performance by young adults was contrasted with young speakers' performance under time pressure (which previous work has argued increases interaction between planning and articulation) and performance by older adults (who may have difficulties inhibiting nontarget representations, leading to heightened interactive effects). The results revealed the presence of interactive effects. Our new analysis techniques revealed these effects were strongest in initial portions of responses, suggesting that speech is initiated as soon as the first segment has been planned. Interactive effects did not increase under response pressure, suggesting interaction between planning and articulation is relatively fixed. Unexpectedly, lexical selection disruptions appeared to yield some degree of facilitation in articulatory processing (possibly reflecting semantic facilitation of target retrieval) and older adults showed weaker, not stronger interactive effects (possibly reflecting weakened connections between lexical and form-level representations). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30024252      PMCID: PMC6339616          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  53 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production.

Authors:  C T Kello; D C Plaut; B MacWhinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

3.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.

Authors:  Eva Belke; Antje S Meyer; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-05

4.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors.

Authors:  Louis Goldstein; Marianne Pouplier; Larissa Chen; Elliot Saltzman; Dani Byrd
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-07-05

5.  A joint investigation of semantic facilitation and semantic interference in continuous naming.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; Francesca Peressotti; Eduardo Navarrete
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The myth of cognitive decline: non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning.

Authors:  Michael Ramscar; Peter Hendrix; Cyrus Shaoul; Petar Milin; Harald Baayen
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-13

7.  Why do semantic priming effects increase in old age? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  G D Laver; D M Burke
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-03

8.  Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.

Authors:  Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

9.  Cascading influences on the production of speech: evidence from articulation.

Authors:  Corey T McMillan; Martin Corley
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-13

10.  CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; James Bartolotti; Sarah Chabal; Anthony Shook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using automated acoustic analysis to explore the link between planning and articulation in second language speech production.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Yosi Shrem; Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron; Cristina Baus; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.331

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.