Literature DB >> 26078330

Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups.

Erin Rothwell1, Rebecca Anderson2, Jeffrey R Botkin2.   

Abstract

This article discusses a new approach for the conduct of focus groups in health research. Identifying ways to educate and inform participants about the topic of interest prior to the focus group discussion can promote more quality data from informed opinions. Data on this deliberative discussion approach are provided from research within three federally funded studies. As healthcare continues to improve from scientific and technological advancements, educating the research participants prior to data collection about these complexities is essential to gather quality data.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  USA; deliberative discussion; education; focus groups; qualitative

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078330      PMCID: PMC5847289          DOI: 10.1177/1049732315591150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  21 in total

1.  Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

Authors:  G Gaskell; M W Bauer; J Durant; N C Allum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.

Authors:  M Campbell; R Fitzpatrick; A Haines; A L Kinmonth; P Sandercock; D Spiegelhalter; P Tyrer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

3.  Citizen science: People power.

Authors:  Eric Hand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Consent forms and the therapeutic misconception: the example of gene transfer research.

Authors:  Nancy M P King; Gail E Henderson; Larry R Churchill; Arlene M Davis; Sara Chandros Hull; Daniel K Nelson; P Christy Parham-Vetter; Barbara Bluestone Rothschild; Michele M Easter; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Making sense of focus groups.

Authors:  Rosaline S Barbour
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Assessing public attitudes on the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples: a focus group study.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Aaron Goldenberg; Michelle H Lewis; Louisa Stark; Matthew Burbank; Bob Wong; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.

Authors:  Samantha A Streicher; Saskia C Sanderson; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Michael Diefenbach; Meg Smirnoff; Inga Peter; Carol R Horowitz; Barbara Brenner; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-06-07

9.  Public attitudes regarding a pilot study of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Louisa Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Jamie L'heureux; Jeffrey C Murray; Patricia Winokur; George Weiner; Elizabeth Newbury; Laura Shinkunas; Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  21 in total

1.  Transportation of Older Adults: Common Behaviors Interfering With Safety.

Authors:  Justine S Sefcik; Christine K Bradway; Pamela Z Cacchione
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.571

2.  Harms of unsuccessful donation after circulatory death: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Anne Buffington; Joseph R Scalea; Norman Fost; Kenneth D Croes; Joshua D Mezrich; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Pediatric oncology nurses' perceptions of prognosis-related communication.

Authors:  Amy R Newman; Kristin Haglund; Cheryl C Rodgers
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  The Complexity of Psychotropic Medication Prescription and Treating Trauma Among Youth in Foster Care: Perspectives from the Lived Experience.

Authors:  Cadence F Bowden; Cassandra Simmel; Alicia Mendez; Melanie Yu; Sheree Neese-Todd; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Aaron Goldenberg; Erin Johnson; Naomi Riches; Beth Tarini; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Antipsychotic treatment for youth in foster care: Perspectives on improving youths' experiences in providing informed consent.

Authors:  Cassandra Simmel; Cadence F Bowden; Sheree Neese-Todd; Justeen Hyde; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2021

7.  Exploring the use of a Comic for Education about Expanded Carrier Screening among a Diverse Group of Mothers.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Erin Johnson; Alena Wilson; Rebecca A Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  Newborn Screening Knowledge and Attitudes Among Midwives and Out-of-Hospital-Birth Parents.

Authors:  Elena Coupal; Kim Hart; Bob Wong; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 2.522

9.  Commercial use of health data-A public "trial" by citizens' jury.

Authors:  Mary P Tully; Lamiece Hassan; Malcolm Oswald; John Ainsworth
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2019-08-18

10.  Partial or total knee replacement? Identifying patients' information needs on knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study to inform a decision aid.

Authors:  Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; Louise Locock; Sara Ryan; James Smith; Lee Bayliss; Hannah Wilson; Andrew Price
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.