Literature DB >> 29073807

An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.

Erin Rothwell1, Aaron Goldenberg2, Erin Johnson1, Naomi Riches1, Beth Tarini3, Jeffrey R Botkin1.   

Abstract

As state newborn screening programs develop approaches to parental permission for the storage and use of residual dried newborn screening samples, it is important to understand how the public comprehends the consent elements. Focus groups in Utah, California, and Michigan ( n = 7 groups, 69 participants) were conducted to evaluate the language on a shortened consent form. Outcomes from the analysis included barriers to conceptualizing biospecimen research, the overly cautious tone and awkwardness of the consent form, and perceptions of community versus individual benefit. This research offers insight on public response to, and comprehension of, commonly used consent language for the storage and use of dried blood spot research in a shortened consent form.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biorepositories/biobanks; focus groups; informed consent; newborn screening; public health research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073807      PMCID: PMC5826543          DOI: 10.1177/1556264617736199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  28 in total

Review 1.  Maintaining your focus in focus groups: avoiding common mistakes.

Authors:  Denise Côté-Arsenault; Dianne Morrison-Beedy
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Questioning the Need for Informed Consent: A Case Study of California's Experience with a Pilot Newborn Screening Research Project.

Authors:  Lisa Feuchtbaum; George Cunningham; Stan Sciortino
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  The problem of rigor in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.824

4.  Assessing public attitudes on the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples: a focus group study.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Aaron Goldenberg; Michelle H Lewis; Louisa Stark; Matthew Burbank; Bob Wong; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken.

Authors:  D L Morgan
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1993-02

6.  Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Public attitudes regarding a pilot study of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Louisa Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lisa Eckstein; Ben Berkman; Dan Brock; Robert Cook-Deegan; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hank Greely; Mats G Hansson; Sara Hull; Scott Kim; Bernie Lo; Rebecca Pentz; Laura Rodriguez; Carol Weil; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Prenatal Education of Parents About Newborn Screening and Residual Dried Blood Spots: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Nancy C Rose; Siobhan M Dolan; Miriam Kuppermann; Louisa A Stark; Aaron Goldenberg; Bob Wong
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Joëlle Y Friedman; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward.

Authors:  Vasiliki Rahimzadeh; Jan M Friedman; Guido de Wert; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Broad-scale informed consent: A survey of the CTSA landscape.

Authors:  Redonna Chandler; Kathleen T Brady; Rebecca N Jerome; Milton Eder; Erin Rothwell; Kimberly A Brownley; Paul A Harris
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.