Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.

× No keyword cloud information.

11 in total

Review 1. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.

Authors: F Bradley; R Wiles; A L Kinmonth; D Mant; M Gantley
Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-03-13

Review 2. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.

Authors: O C Ukoumunne; M C Gulliford; S Chinn; J A Sterne; P G Burney
Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1999 Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.

Authors: S J Edwards; D A Braunholtz; R J Lilford; A J Stevens
Journal: BMJ Date: 1999-05-22

Review 4. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors: J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1995-03

Review 5. Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.

Authors: B Haynes; A Haines
Journal: BMJ Date: 1998-07-25

Review 6. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

Authors: R Fitzpatrick; C Davey; M J Buxton; D R Jones
Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.014

7. Surgical procedures and devices should be evaluated in the same way as medical therapy.

Authors: H Buchwald
Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 1997-12

8. Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

Authors: C R Brewin; C Bradley
Journal: BMJ Date: 1989-07-29

9. Innovations in services and the appliance of science.

Authors: A Haines; S Iliffe
Journal: BMJ Date: 1995-04-01

Review 10. The effectiveness of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care: a systematic review.

Authors: S Shepperd; S Iliffe
Journal: J Public Health Med Date: 1998-09

954 in total

Review 1. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Authors: L Rychetnik; M Frommer; P Hawe; A Shiell
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.710

2. The management of diabetes.

Authors: S J Griffin
Journal: BMJ Date: 2001-10-27

3. Randomised controlled trial of training health visitors to identify and help couples with relationship problems following a birth.

Authors: J Simons; J Reynolds; L Morison
Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 5.386

Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.

Review 1. Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.

Review 2. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.

Review 3. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.

Review 4. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Review 5. Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.

Review 6. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

7. Surgical procedures and devices should be evaluated in the same way as medical therapy.

8. Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

9. Innovations in services and the appliance of science.

Review 10. The effectiveness of hospital at home compared with in-patient hospital care: a systematic review.

Review 1. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

2. The management of diabetes.

3. Randomised controlled trial of training health visitors to identify and help couples with relationship problems following a birth.

4. New provincial initiatives for childhood disabilities: the imperative for research.

5. Use of interactive multimedia decision aids. Alternative explanation for results may exist.

6. Treating the patient or the population? Part 2. Judging the benefit of a treatment to society as a whole.

7. More randomised controlled studies in speech and language therapy.

8. Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself.

Review 9. Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care.

10. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines. Computer support is complex intervention.