Literature DB >> 22398141

Assessing public attitudes on the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples: a focus group study.

Erin Rothwell1, Rebecca Anderson, Aaron Goldenberg, Michelle H Lewis, Louisa Stark, Matthew Burbank, Bob Wong, Jeffrey R Botkin.   

Abstract

This paper discusses attitudes and opinions of a diverse group of participants toward the retention and use of residual newborn blood samples for research. Data were drawn from focus groups based in six states in the USA, and results provide support for the retention and use of residual newborn blood samples for research when parental permission is asked beforehand. However, there were a number of concerns that also warrant attention for the development of policy and maintaining trust with the public, such as timing of permission, use of samples already stored, level of personal control of sample use and education. The results demonstrate the complexity of the topic and the ethical ambiguities associated with the retention and use of residual newborn blood samples.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22398141      PMCID: PMC3343738          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future - a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Amanda Amos
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  1998-01

3.  Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-05-10

4.  Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Louisa Stark; Aaron Goldenberg; Michelle Lewis; Matthew Burbank; Bob Wong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; A Hawkins
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Storing newborn blood spots: modern controversies.

Authors:  Linda Kharaboyan; Denise Avard; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Concerns of newborn blood screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots.

Authors:  Erin W Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Matthew J Burbank; Aaron J Goldenberg; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Louisa A Stark; Bob Wong; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Not without my permission: parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research.

Authors:  B A Tarini; A Goldenberg; D Singer; S J Clark; A Butchart; M M Davis
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank.

Authors:  Alon B Neidich; Josh W Joseph; Carole Ober; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  24 in total

1.  Public concerns regarding the storage and secondary uses of residual newborn bloodspots: an analysis of print media, legal cases, and public engagement activities.

Authors:  Shannon Cunningham; Kieran C O'Doherty; Karine Sénécal; David Secko; Denise Avard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 2.  Retention and research use of residual newborn screening bloodspots.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Aaron J Goldenberg; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Michelle Huckaby Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Applying deep DNA sequencing to common, complex pediatric traits.

Authors:  John M Dagle; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: a survey of underrepresented parents.

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Experiences among Women with Positive Prenatal Expanded Carrier Screening Results.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Erin Johnson; Amber Mathiesen; Kylie Golden; Audrey Metcalf; Nancy C Rose; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-06-15

7.  What parents want to know about the storage and use of residual newborn bloodspots.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Aaron Goldenberg; Miriam Kuppermann; Siobhan M Dolan; Nancy C Rose; Louisa Stark
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Public attitudes regarding a pilot study of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Louisa Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Biobanking Research and Human Subjects Protections: Perspectives of IRB Leaders.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Karen J Maschke; Jeffrey R Botkin; Aaron Goldenberg; Thomas H Murray; Suzanne M Rivera
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

10.  Community perspectives on public health biobanking: an analysis of community meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health.

Authors:  Daniel B Thiel; Tevah Platt; Jodyn Platt; Susan B King; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.