Literature DB >> 34721662

Exploring the use of a Comic for Education about Expanded Carrier Screening among a Diverse Group of Mothers.

Erin Rothwell1, Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell1, Erin Johnson1, Alena Wilson1, Rebecca A Anderson1, Jeffrey Botkin1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Expanded carrier screening (ECS) during prenatal care is an important test for identifying prospective parents' risk of inherited genetic diseases. However, barriers remain for effectively educating patients about ECS. Graphic medicine (i.e. comics) has grown as a mechanism for patient education. The purpose of this study was to explore attitudes and opinions of a comic to educate about ECS during prental care.
Methods: Focus groups were conducted with pregnant women or women who recently gave birth (6 groups, n=54). The participants were all female, 44.4% Latino/Hispanic, 16.7% Bi-Racial/Other, and 43.3% reporting some college education or high school degree.
Results: Most participants reported high enjoyment with the comic due to their relatability to the characters, simplicity of the story, description of medical outcomes in everyday terms and the exploration of multiple outcomes possible with ECS. In addition, participants reported that during pregnancy their reading habits increase as well as emotional reactions to the content and some participants stated they avoided reading information that may cause stress or anxiety.
Conclusion: More research is needed to assess what features of the comic promote understanding and how that influences decisions and pre-test patient education for ECS. The use of graphic narratives may enable individuals to better understand medical information in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  focus groups; genetic carrier screening; health education; health literacy; narration

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34721662      PMCID: PMC8553176          DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2021.1909398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Healthc        ISSN: 1753-8068


  23 in total

1.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

Authors:  M C Green; T C Brock
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Current controversies in traditional and expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; James D Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Authors:  Janice G Edwards; Gerald Feldman; James Goldberg; Anthony R Gregg; Mary E Norton; Nancy C Rose; Adele Schneider; Katie Stoll; Ronald Wapner; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Experiences and lessons learned by genetic counselors in returning secondary genetic findings to patients.

Authors:  Carly Rost; Karin M Dent; Jeffrey Botkin; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-06-15

7.  Telling stories, saving lives: creating narrative health messages.

Authors:  Lauren B Frank; Sheila T Murphy; Joyee S Chatterjee; Meghan B Moran; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015

8.  Preconception Carrier Screening by Genome Sequencing: Results from the Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Sumit Punj; Yassmine Akkari; Jennifer Huang; Fei Yang; Allison Creason; Christine Pak; Amiee Potter; Michael O Dorschner; Deborah A Nickerson; Peggy D Robertson; Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jennifer Schleit; Dana Kostiner Simpson; Alan F Rope; Jacob Reiss; Tia Kauffman; Marian J Gilmore; Patricia Himes; Benjamin Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard; C Sue Richards
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Should Clinicians Leave "Expanded" Carrier Screening Decisions to Patients?

Authors:  Amanda Fakih; Kayte Spector-Bagdady
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  Estimating yields of prenatal carrier screening and implications for design of expanded carrier screening panels.

Authors:  Michael H Guo; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.