B Pass1, P Robinson1,2, R Hodgson3, A J Grainger1,2. 1. 1 Musculoskeletal Centre X-Ray Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK. 2. 2 Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 3. 3 Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a single isotropic three-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) proton density fat-saturated (PD FS) sequence reconstructed in three planes could replace the three PD (FS) sequences in our standard protocol at 1.5 T (Siemens Avanto, Erlangen, Germany). METHODS: A 3D FSE PD water excitation sequence was included in the protocol for 95 consecutive patients referred for routine knee MRI. This was used to produce offline reconstructions in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. Two radiologists independently assessed each case twice, once using the standard MRI protocol and once replacing the standard PD (FS) sequences with reconstructions from the 3D data set. Following scoring, the observer reviewed the 3D data set and performed multiplanar reformats to see if this altered confidence. The menisci, ligaments and cartilage were assessed, and statistical analysis was performed using the standard sequence as the reference standard. RESULTS: The reporting accuracy was as follows: medial meniscus (MM) = 90.9%, lateral meniscus (LM) = 93.7%, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) = 98.9% and cartilage surfaces = 85.8%. Agreement among the readers was for the standard protocol: MM kappa = 0.91, LM = 0.89, ACL = 0.98 and cartilage = 0.84; and for the 3D protocol: MM = 0.86, LM = 0.77, ACL = 0.94 and cartilage = 0.64. CONCLUSION: A 3D PD FSE sequence reconstructed in three planes gives reduced accuracy and decreased concordance among readers compared with conventional sequences when evaluating the menisci and cartilage with a 1.5-T MRI scanner. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using the existing 1.5-T MR systems, a 3D FSE sequence should not replace two-dimensional sequences.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a single isotropic three-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) proton density fat-saturated (PD FS) sequence reconstructed in three planes could replace the three PD (FS) sequences in our standard protocol at 1.5 T (Siemens Avanto, Erlangen, Germany). METHODS: A 3D FSE PDwater excitation sequence was included in the protocol for 95 consecutive patients referred for routine knee MRI. This was used to produce offline reconstructions in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. Two radiologists independently assessed each case twice, once using the standard MRI protocol and once replacing the standard PD (FS) sequences with reconstructions from the 3D data set. Following scoring, the observer reviewed the 3D data set and performed multiplanar reformats to see if this altered confidence. The menisci, ligaments and cartilage were assessed, and statistical analysis was performed using the standard sequence as the reference standard. RESULTS: The reporting accuracy was as follows: medial meniscus (MM) = 90.9%, lateral meniscus (LM) = 93.7%, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) = 98.9% and cartilage surfaces = 85.8%. Agreement among the readers was for the standard protocol: MM kappa = 0.91, LM = 0.89, ACL = 0.98 and cartilage = 0.84; and for the 3D protocol: MM = 0.86, LM = 0.77, ACL = 0.94 and cartilage = 0.64. CONCLUSION: A 3D PD FSE sequence reconstructed in three planes gives reduced accuracy and decreased concordance among readers compared with conventional sequences when evaluating the menisci and cartilage with a 1.5-T MRI scanner. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using the existing 1.5-T MR systems, a 3D FSE sequence should not replace two-dimensional sequences.
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Donna G Blankenbaker; Michael A Woods; Kazuhiko Shinki; Arthur A De Smet; Scott B Reeder Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Oliver Ristow; Lynne Steinbach; Gregory Sabo; Roland Krug; Markus Huber; Isabel Rauscher; Ben Ma; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Charles Q Li; Weitian Chen; Jarrett K Rosenberg; Philip J Beatty; Richard Kijowski; Brian A Hargreaves; Reed F Busse; Garry E Gold Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Noh Hyuck Park; Jin Hwan Ahn; Eun Chul Chung; Sung Jun Kim; Jang Gyu Cha Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Mike Notohamiprodjo; Annie Horng; Matthias F Pietschmann; Peter E Müller; Wilhelm Horger; Jaeseok Park; Alexander Crispin; José Raya Garcia del Olmo; Sabine Weckbach; Karin A Herrmann; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Glaser Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Kirkland W Davis; Donna G Blankenbaker; Michael A Woods; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Arthur A De Smet Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-03-12 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Jin Young Jung; Young Cheol Yoon; Hye Rin Kim; Bong-Keun Choe; Joon Ho Wang; Jee Young Jung Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mike Notohamiprodjo; Annie Horng; Bernhard Kuschel; Dominik Paul; Guobin Li; Jose G Raya; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Glaser Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Adam Przeworski; Zbigniew Adamiak; Michał Nowicki; Marta Mieszkowska; Angelika Tobolska; Joanna Głodek Journal: J Vet Res Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 1.744