Literature DB >> 26059275

Disease reclassification risk with stringent criteria and frequent monitoring in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

John W Davis1, John F Ward1, Curtis A Pettaway1, Xuemei Wang2, Deborah Kuban3, Steven J Frank3, Andrew K Lee3, Louis L Pisters1, Surena F Matin1, Jay B Shah1, Jose A Karam1, Brian F Chapin1, John N Papadopoulos1, Mary Achim1, Karen E Hoffman3, Thomas J Pugh3, Seungtaek Choi3, Patricia Troncoso4, Christopher J Logothetis5, Jeri Kim5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of disease reclassification and to identify clinicopathological variables associated with it in patients with favourable-risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 191 men, selected by what may be the most stringent criteria used in AS studies yet conducted, who were enrolled in a prospective cohort AS trial. Clinicopathological characteristics were analysed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Key features were an extended biopsy with a single core positive for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 (<3 mm) or 3 + 4 (<2 mm) and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level <4 ng/mL (adjusted for prostate volume). Biopsies were repeated every 1-2 years and clinical evaluations every 6 months. Disease was reclassified when PSA level increased by 30% from baseline, or when biopsy tumour length increased beyond the enrolment criteria, more than one positive core was detected or any grade increased to a dominant 4 pattern or any 5 pattern.
RESULTS: Disease was reclassified in 32 patients (16.8%) including upgrading to GS 4 + 3 in five patients (2.6%). The median (interquartile range) follow-up time among survivors was 3 (1.9-4.6) years. Overall, 13 of the 32 (40.6%) had incremental increases in GS. Tumour length (hazard ratio 2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-6.46; P = 0.007) and older age (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.09; P = 0.05) were identified as significant and marginally significant predictors of disease reclassification, respectively. Disease remained stable in 83.2% of patients.
CONCLUSION: The need persists for improvements in risk stratification and predictive indicators of cancer progression.
© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active surveillance; biopsy; prostate; prostate cancer; tumour; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059275      PMCID: PMC4808616          DOI: 10.1111/bju.13193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  40 in total

1.  The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.

Authors:  Atsushi Ochiai; Patricia Troncoso; Michael E Chen; Joseph Lloreta; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.

Authors:  David Margel; Indrani Nandy; Timothy H Wilson; Ramiro Castro; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Radical prostatectomy findings in patients predicted to have low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed by extended-core biopsies: an analysis of volume and zonal distribution of tumour foci.

Authors:  John W Davis; Jeri Kim; John F Ward; Xuemai Wang; Hiro Nakanishi; R Joseph Babaian; Patricia Troncoso
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The distribution of prostate specific antigen in men without clinical or pathological evidence of prostate cancer: relationship to gland volume and age.

Authors:  R J Babaian; H Miyashita; R B Evans; E I Ramirez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Risk of Gleason grade inaccuracies in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Ronald H Shapiro; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer: a tool in selecting patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Xuemei Wang; Atsushi Ochiai; Kiril Trpkov; Asli Yilmaz; J Bryan Donnelly; John W Davis; Patricia Troncoso; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  15 in total

1.  Baseline and longitudinal plasma caveolin-1 level as a biomarker in active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; John W Davis; Brian F Chapin; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Louis L Pisters; Neema Navai; Mary F Achim; Xuemei Wang; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Seungtaek Choi; Deborah Kuban; Patricia Troncoso; Sam Hanash; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Genetic associations of T cell cancer immune response with tumor aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer patients and disease reclassification in an active surveillance cohort.

Authors:  Qinchuan Wang; Justin R Gregg; Jian Gu; Yuanqing Ye; David W Chang; John W Davis; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim; Christopher J Logothetis; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Is active surveillance a suitable option for African American men with prostate cancer? A systemic literature review.

Authors:  M I Gökce; D Sundi; E Schaeffer; C Pettaway
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  The implications of ageing and life expectancy in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Sarathi Kalra; Spyridon Basourakos; Angela Abouassi; Mary Achim; Robert J Volk; Karen E Hoffman; John W Davis; Jeri Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Genetic variants in epithelial-mesenchymal transition genes as predictors of clinical outcomes in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yang Deng; Kunlin Xie; Christopher J Logothetis; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim; Maosheng Huang; David W Chang; Jian Gu; Xifeng Wu; Yuanqing Ye
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  [Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Association Between African American Race and Clinical Outcomes in Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Rishi Deka; P Travis Courtney; J Kellogg Parsons; Tyler J Nelson; Vinit Nalawade; Elaine Luterstein; Daniel R Cherry; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; James D Murphy; Anthony V D'Amico; Christopher J Kane; Maria Elena Martinez; Brent S Rose
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Genetic variants of the Wnt signaling pathway as predictors of aggressive disease and reclassification in men with early stage prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Xiang Shu; Yuanqing Ye; Jian Gu; Yonggang He; John W Davis; Timothy C Thompson; Christopher J Logothetis; Jeri Kim; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Determining Clinically Based Factors Associated With Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; John W Davis; Chad Reichard; Xuemei Wang; Mary Achim; Brian F Chapin; Louis Pisters; Curtis Pettaway; John F Ward; Seungtaek Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Deborah Kuban; Richard Babaian; Patricia Troncoso; Lydia T Madsen; Christopher Logothetis; Jeri Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Jeannette M Schenk; Lisa F Newcomb; Yingye Zheng; Anna V Faino; Kehao Zhu; Yaw A Nyame; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Atreya Dash; Christopher P Filson; Martin E Gleave; Michael Liss; Francis M Martin; Todd M Morgan; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Andrew A Wagner; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.