Literature DB >> 26831055

[Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].

Annika Herlemann1, Christian G Stief2.   

Abstract

Autopsy studies have confirmed the high prevalence of latent prostate cancer; however, only a certain portion of patients require definite treatment. Active surveillance is one of the treatment options which, according to national and international guidelines, should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer. Prostate cancer-specific survival is high in these patients; therefore, curative treatment, such as radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy may be initially deferred in order to avoid therapy-related side effects. In order to qualify for active surveillance, strict inclusion criteria have to be met; nevertheless, the reliable identification of low-risk prostate cancer patients is not always possible. Patients under active surveillance are followed up regularly with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, digital rectal examination (DRE) and repeat prostate biopsies. Due to the heterogeneity of primary prostate tumors precise molecular diagnostic techniques could allow individualized treatment strategies in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Gleason score; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26831055     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-0025-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  75 in total

1.  Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The natural course of pT2 prostate cancer with positive surgical margin: predicting biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  A Karl; A Buchner; C Tympner; T Kirchner; U Ganswindt; C Belka; R Ganzer; M Burger; F Eder; F Hofstädter; D Schilling; K Sievert; A Stenzl; M Scharpf; F Fend; F Vom Dorp; H Rübben; K Schmid; D Porres-Knoblauch; A Heidenreich; B Hangarter; R Knüchel-Clarke; M Rogenhofer; B Wullich; A Hartmann; E Comploj; A Pycha; E Hanspeter; D Pehrke; G Sauter; M Graefen; C Stief; A Haese
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Exome sequencing of prostate cancer supports the hypothesis of independent tumour origins.

Authors:  Johan Lindberg; Daniel Klevebring; Wennuan Liu; Mårten Neiman; Jianfeng Xu; Peter Wiklund; Fredrik Wiklund; Ian G Mills; Lars Egevad; Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Seth K Bechis; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Delay from biopsy to radical prostatectomy influences the rate of adverse pathologic outcomes.

Authors:  William T Berg; Matthew R Danzig; Jamie S Pak; Ruslan Korets; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Gregory Hruby; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting.

Authors:  Gunnar Steineck; Fred Helgesen; Jan Adolfsson; Paul W Dickman; Jan-Erik Johansson; Bo Johan Norlén; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; M Schnall; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  High risk of under-grading and -staging in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Isabel Heidegger; Viktor Skradski; Eberhard Steiner; Helmut Klocker; Renate Pichler; Andreas Pircher; Wolfgang Horninger; Jasmin Bektic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Sari Laitinen; Sofia Khan; Mauno Vihinen; Jeanne Kowalski; Guoqiang Yu; Li Chen; Charles M Ewing; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Yue Wang; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Tapio Visakorpi; G Steven Bova
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Importance and determinants of Gleason score undergrading on biopsy sample of prostate cancer in a population-based study.

Authors:  Elisabetta Rapiti; Robin Schaffar; Christophe Iselin; Raymond Miralbell; Marie-Françoise Pelte; Damien Weber; Roberto Zanetti; Isabelle Neyroud-Caspar; Christine Bouchardy
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Radical prostatectomy as part of a multimodal concept for patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases at initial diagnosis].

Authors:  A Spek; A Herlemann; C Gratzke; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.