Literature DB >> 31651227

African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.

Jeannette M Schenk1, Lisa F Newcomb1,2, Yingye Zheng1, Anna V Faino1, Kehao Zhu1, Yaw A Nyame2, James D Brooks3, Peter R Carroll4, Matthew R Cooperberg4, Atreya Dash2, Christopher P Filson5, Martin E Gleave6, Michael Liss7, Francis M Martin8, Todd M Morgan9, Peter S Nelson1, Ian M Thompson10, Andrew A Wagner11, Daniel W Lin1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a large, prospective, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort we evaluated whether African American men are at higher risk for reclassification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Canary PASS (Prostate Active Surveillance Study) is a protocol driven, active surveillance cohort with a prespecified prostate specific antigen and surveillance biopsy regimen. Men included in this study had Gleason Grade Group 1 or 2 disease at diagnosis and fewer than 5 years between diagnosis and enrollment, and had undergone 1 or more surveillance biopsies. The reclassification risk, defined as an increase in the Gleason score on subsequent biopsy, was compared between African American and Caucasian American men using Cox proportional hazards models. In the subset of men who underwent delayed prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathology findings, defined as pT3a or greater disease, or Gleason Grade Group 3 or greater, was compared in African American and Caucasian American men.
RESULTS: Of the 1,315 men 89 (7%) were African American and 1,226 (93%) were Caucasian American. There was no difference in the treatment rate in African American and Caucasian American men. In multivariate models African American race was not associated with the risk of reclassification (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78-1.72). Of the 441 men who underwent prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance the rate of adverse pathology was similar in those who were African American and Caucasian American (46% vs 47%, p=0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Of men on active surveillance who followed a standardized protocol of regular prostate specific antigen testing and biopsy those who were African American were not at increased risk for pathological reclassification while on active surveillance, or for adverse pathology findings at prostatectomy. Active surveillance appears to be an appropriate management strategy for African American men with favorable risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; risk; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31651227      PMCID: PMC7384451          DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Amy S Leonardson; Donna Ankerst; Roman Gulati; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce J Trock; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Laurence H Klotz; Alexandre Mamedov; David F Penson; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Welty; Janet E Cowan; Hao Nguyen; Katsuto Shinohara; Nannette Perez; Kirsten L Greene; June M Chan; Maxwell V Meng; Jeffry P Simko; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Racial Disparities in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Suprita Krishna; Yunhua Fan; Stephanie Jarosek; Oluwakayode Adejoro; Karim Chamie; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Disease reclassification risk with stringent criteria and frequent monitoring in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Authors:  John W Davis; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Xuemei Wang; Deborah Kuban; Steven J Frank; Andrew K Lee; Louis L Pisters; Surena F Matin; Jay B Shah; Jose A Karam; Brian F Chapin; John N Papadopoulos; Mary Achim; Karen E Hoffman; Thomas J Pugh; Seungtaek Choi; Patricia Troncoso; Christopher J Logothetis; Jeri Kim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gap.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Is active surveillance a suitable option for African American men with prostate cancer? A systemic literature review.

Authors:  M I Gökce; D Sundi; E Schaeffer; C Pettaway
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Danny Vesprini; Perakaa Sethukavalan; Vibhuti Jethava; Liying Zhang; Suneil Jain; Toshihiro Yamamoto; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in African American men: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Brian D Odom; M C Mir; Scott Hughes; Cedric Senechal; Alexis Santy; Remi Eyraud; Andrew J Stephenson; Kelly Ylitalo; Ranko Miocinovic
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Race is associated with discontinuation of active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: results from the Duke Prostate Center.

Authors:  M R Abern; M R Bassett; M Tsivian; L L Bañez; T J Polascik; M N Ferrandino; C N Robertson; S J Freedland; J W Moul
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Mufaddal Mamawala; Jonathan I Epstein; Patricia Landis; Sacha Wolf; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Treatment in the absence of disease reclassification among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Kehao Zhu; Yingye Zheng; Lisa F Newcomb; Jeannette M Schenk; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Atreya Dash; William J Ellis; Christopher P Filson; Martin E Gleave; Michael Liss; Frances Martin; Jesse K McKenney; Todd M Morgan; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Andrew A Wagner; Daniel W Lin; John L Gore
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Evaluating the Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer: Prospective Results from the Canary PASS Cohort.

Authors:  Adrian J Waisman Malaret; Peter Chang; Kehao Zhu; Yingye Zheng; Lisa F Newcomb; Menghan Liu; Jesse K McKenney; James D Brooks; Peter Carroll; Atreya Dash; Christopher P Filson; Martin E Gleave; Michael Liss; Frances M Martin; Todd M Morgan; Peter S Nelson; Daniel W Lin; Andrew A Wagner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer in Black men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hari T Vigneswaran; Luke Mittelstaedt; Alessio Crippa; Martin Eklund; Adriana Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Michael R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: selection criteria, guidelines, and outcomes.

Authors:  Colton H Walker; Kathryn A Marchetti; Udit Singhal; Todd M Morgan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Men: Spotlight on an Empty Stage.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.

Authors:  Lauren Folgosa Cooley; Adaeze A Emeka; Travis J Meyers; Phillip R Cooper; Daniel W Lin; Antonio Finelli; James A Eastham; Christopher J Logothetis; Leonard S Marks; Danny Vesprini; S Larry Goldenberg; Celestia S Higano; Christian P Pavlovich; June M Chan; Todd M Morgan; Eric A Klein; Daniel A Barocas; Stacy Loeb; Brian T Helfand; Denise M Scholtens; John S Witte; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.600

7.  The Impact of Intensifying Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men: A Model-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Yaw A Nyame; Roman Gulati; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Alex Tsodikov; Angela B Mariotto; John L Gore; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 11.816

8.  Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Soohyun Hwang; Emily Morrow; Kim S Kimminau; Kelly Goonan; Laurie Petty; Edward Ellerbeck; J Brantley Thrasher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Urinary Thromboxane B2 and Lethal Prostate Cancer in African American Men.

Authors:  Maeve Kiely; Ginger L Milne; Tsion Z Minas; Tiffany H Dorsey; Wei Tang; Cheryl J Smith; Francine Baker; Christopher A Loffredo; Clayton Yates; Michael B Cook; Stefan Ambs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Comparison by Race of Conservative Management for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancers in Veterans From 2004 to 2018.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Kyle W Robinson; Sumedha Chhatre; Elina Medvedeva; John P Cashy; Shika Veera; Joshua M Bauml; Tito Fojo; Amol S Navathe; S Bruce Malkowicz; Ronac Mamtani; Ravishankar Jayadevappa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.