Literature DB >> 15163773

Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Ian M Thompson1, Donna K Pauler, Phyllis J Goodman, Catherine M Tangen, M Scott Lucia, Howard L Parnes, Lori M Minasian, Leslie G Ford, Scott M Lippman, E David Crawford, John J Crowley, Charles A Coltman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal upper limit of the normal range for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is unknown. We investigated the prevalence of prostate cancer among men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial who had a PSA level of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less.
METHODS: Of 18,882 men enrolled in the prevention trial, 9459 were randomly assigned to receive placebo and had an annual measurement of PSA and a digital rectal examination. Among these 9459 men, 2950 men never had a PSA level of more than 4.0 ng per milliliter or an abnormal digital rectal examination, had a final PSA determination, and underwent a prostate biopsy after being in the study for seven years.
RESULTS: Among the 2950 men (age range, 62 to 91 years), prostate cancer was diagnosed in 449 (15.2 percent); 67 of these 449 cancers (14.9 percent) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher. The prevalence of prostate cancer was 6.6 percent among men with a PSA level of up to 0.5 ng per milliliter, 10.1 percent among those with values of 0.6 to 1.0 ng per milliliter, 17.0 percent among those with values of 1.1 to 2.0 ng per milliliter, 23.9 percent among those with values of 2.1 to 3.0 ng per milliliter, and 26.9 percent among those with values of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter. The prevalence of high-grade cancers increased from 12.5 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 0.5 ng per milliliter or less to 25.0 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter.
CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy-detected prostate cancer, including high-grade cancers, is not rare among men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less--levels generally thought to be in the normal range. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163773     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  580 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: Attitudes and practices of family physicians in Ontario.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Shawn Dason; Janis Lusis; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prospective blinded comparison of real-time sonoelastography targeted versus randomised biopsy of the prostate in the primary and re-biopsy setting.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Andreas Brandtner; Wolf F Wieland; Hans-Martin Fritsche
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prostate cancer detection strategies.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Javier Hernandez; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Joseph W Basler; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Serum phospholipid fatty acids and prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Theodore M Brasky; Cathee Till; Emily White; Marian L Neuhouser; Xiaoling Song; Phyllis Goodman; Ian M Thompson; Irena B King; Demetrius Albanes; Alan R Kristal
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Association between systemic inflammation and serum prostate-specific antigen in a healthy Korean population.

Authors:  Jonghyun Yun; Hyunyoung Lee; Wonjae Yang
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

7.  The effects of cigarette smoking on prostate-specific antigen in two different age groups.

Authors:  Gokhan Koc; Korhan Akgul; Yuksel Yilmaz; Alper Dirik; Sitki Un
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.