Literature DB >> 31899230

Determining Clinically Based Factors Associated With Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort.

Justin R Gregg1, John W Davis2, Chad Reichard2, Xuemei Wang3, Mary Achim2, Brian F Chapin2, Louis Pisters2, Curtis Pettaway2, John F Ward2, Seungtaek Choi4, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen4, Deborah Kuban4, Richard Babaian2, Patricia Troncoso5, Lydia T Madsen6, Christopher Logothetis7, Jeri Kim8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report biopsy-related and oncologic outcomes in a large prospective active surveillance cohort that was initiated in the premagnetic resonance imaging era and to additionally identify clinical factors associated with disease reclassification in order to inform future studies designed to improve enrollment and follow-up on active surveillance.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled at a single institution from 2006 to 2014 and followed until 2016. Men with Gleason 6 or 7 disease were eligible, and those with >6 months follow-up were included in the analysis. Patients were risk stratified based on clinical/pathologic criteria, including based on a combination of baseline and confirmatory biopsy tumor characteristics. Reclassification-free survival, based on tumor volume increase or Gleason score increase, was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Of 825 enrolled patients, 682 met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 6.6-126.8). Disease was reclassified in 249 (36.5%), and 157 (23.0%) underwent treatment. A single positive core with a negative confirmatory biopsy was significantly associated with time to reclassification (median not met vs 43 months, log rank test P <.001). Composite tumor length, defined as the combined tumor length between baseline and confirmatory biopsies, was associated with shorter Gleason upgrade-free survival (hazard ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.40, P <.001) in multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: Baseline stratification using clinical factors including tumor length may refine risk stratification and offer the foundation on which new systems that incorporate modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging may be based.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31899230      PMCID: PMC7141963          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  26 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Daan Nieboer; Francesco Giganti; Caroline M Moore; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Disease reclassification risk with stringent criteria and frequent monitoring in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance.

Authors:  John W Davis; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Xuemei Wang; Deborah Kuban; Steven J Frank; Andrew K Lee; Louis L Pisters; Surena F Matin; Jay B Shah; Jose A Karam; Brian F Chapin; John N Papadopoulos; Mary Achim; Karen E Hoffman; Thomas J Pugh; Seungtaek Choi; Patricia Troncoso; Christopher J Logothetis; Jeri Kim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Janet E Cowan; Joseph A Smith; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Mufaddal Mamawala; Hiten D Patel; Ridwan Alam; Jonathan I Epstein; Ashley E Ross; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Precision Medicine in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Development of the Canary-Early Detection Research Network Active Surveillance Biopsy Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Jing Xia; Ian M Thompson; Josef Hoefler; Lisa F Newcomb; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; William J Ellis; Martin E Gleave; Raymond S Lance; Peter S Nelson; Andrew A Wagner; John T Wei; Ruth Etzioni; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 10.  Cost consideration in utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Hutchinson; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.

Authors:  Lauren Folgosa Cooley; Adaeze A Emeka; Travis J Meyers; Phillip R Cooper; Daniel W Lin; Antonio Finelli; James A Eastham; Christopher J Logothetis; Leonard S Marks; Danny Vesprini; S Larry Goldenberg; Celestia S Higano; Christian P Pavlovich; June M Chan; Todd M Morgan; Eric A Klein; Daniel A Barocas; Stacy Loeb; Brian T Helfand; Denise M Scholtens; John S Witte; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.600

2.  Genetic Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment.

Authors:  Yu Jiang; Travis J Meyers; Adaeze A Emeka; Lauren Folgosa Cooley; Phillip R Cooper; Nicola Lancki; Irene Helenowski; Linda Kachuri; Daniel W Lin; Janet L Stanford; Lisa F Newcomb; Suzanne Kolb; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Maria Komisarenko; James A Eastham; Behfar Ehdaie; Nicole Benfante; Christopher J Logothetis; Justin R Gregg; Cherie A Perez; Sergio Garza; Jeri Kim; Leonard S Marks; Merdie Delfin; Danielle Barsa; Danny Vesprini; Laurence H Klotz; Andrew Loblaw; Alexandre Mamedov; S Larry Goldenberg; Celestia S Higano; Maria Spillane; Eugenia Wu; H Ballentine Carter; Christian P Pavlovich; Mufaddal Mamawala; Tricia Landis; Peter R Carroll; June M Chan; Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Todd M Morgan; Javed Siddiqui; Rabia Martin; Eric A Klein; Karen Brittain; Paige Gotwald; Daniel A Barocas; Jeremiah R Dallmer; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Pam Steele; Shilajit D Kundu; Jazmine Stockdale; Monique J Roobol; Lionne D F Venderbos; Martin G Sanda; Rebecca Arnold; Dattatraya Patil; Christopher P Evans; Marc A Dall'Era; Anjali Vij; Anthony J Costello; Ken Chow; Niall M Corcoran; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Courtney Phares; Douglas S Scherr; Thomas Flynn; R Jeffrey Karnes; Michael Koch; Courtney Rose Dhondt; Joel B Nelson; Dawn McBride; Michael S Cookson; Kelly L Stratton; Stephen Farriester; Erin Hemken; Walter M Stadler; Tuula Pera; Deimante Banionyte; Fernando J Bianco; Isabel H Lopez; Stacy Loeb; Samir S Taneja; Nataliya Byrne; Christopher L Amling; Ann Martinez; Luc Boileau; Franklin D Gaylis; Jacqueline Petkewicz; Nicholas Kirwen; Brian T Helfand; Jianfeng Xu; Denise M Scholtens; William J Catalona; John S Witte
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-11-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.