Literature DB >> 26040472

Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

David A Hormuth1, Jared A Weis, Stephanie L Barnes, Michael I Miga, Erin C Rericha, Vito Quaranta, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

Reaction-diffusion models have been widely used to model glioma growth. However, it has not been shown how accurately this model can predict future tumor status using model parameters (i.e., tumor cell diffusion and proliferation) estimated from quantitative in vivo imaging data. To this end, we used in silico studies to develop the methods needed to accurately estimate tumor specific reaction-diffusion model parameters, and then tested the accuracy with which these parameters can predict future growth. The analogous study was then performed in a murine model of glioma growth. The parameter estimation approach was tested using an in silico tumor 'grown' for ten days as dictated by the reaction-diffusion equation. Parameters were estimated from early time points and used to predict subsequent growth. Prediction accuracy was assessed at global (total volume and Dice value) and local (concordance correlation coefficient, CCC) levels. Guided by the in silico study, rats (n = 9) with C6 gliomas, imaged with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging, were used to evaluate the model's accuracy for predicting in vivo tumor growth. The in silico study resulted in low global (tumor volume error <8.8%, Dice >0.92) and local (CCC values >0.80) level errors for predictions up to six days into the future. The in vivo study showed higher global (tumor volume error >11.7%, Dice <0.81) and higher local (CCC <0.33) level errors over the same time period. The in silico study shows that model parameters can be accurately estimated and used to accurately predict future tumor growth at both the global and local scale. However, the poor predictive accuracy in the experimental study suggests the reaction-diffusion equation is an incomplete description of in vivo C6 glioma biology and may require further modeling of intra-tumor interactions including segmentation of (for example) proliferative and necrotic regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26040472      PMCID: PMC4486062          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  49 in total

1.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment.

Authors:  J Martin Brown; William R Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  An evolutionary hybrid cellular automaton model of solid tumour growth.

Authors:  P Gerlee; A R A Anderson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Role of necrosis in regulating the growth saturation of multicellular spheroids.

Authors:  J P Freyer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Determinants of drug delivery and transport to solid tumors.

Authors:  J L Au; S H Jang; J Zheng; C T Chen; S Song; L Hu; M G Wientjes
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms of glioma cell migration and invasion.

Authors:  Tim Demuth; Michael E Berens
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Assessing reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Mary E Loveless; Stephanie L Barnes; Daniel C Colvin; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Glioma vascularity correlates with reduced patient survival and increased malignancy.

Authors:  Stephen M Russell; Robert Elliott; David Forshaw; John G Golfinos; Peter K Nelson; Patrick J Kelly
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2009-03-29

10.  A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana Abramson; Jaime Farley; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

2.  Diffusion MRI biomarkers predict the outcome of irreversible electroporation in a pancreatic tumor mouse model.

Authors:  Matteo Figini; Xifu Wang; Tianchu Lyu; Zhanliang Su; Bin Wang; Chong Sun; Junjie Shangguan; Liang Pan; Kang Zhou; Quanhong Ma; Vahid Yaghmai; Daniele Procissi; Andrew C Larson; Zhuoli Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; J T Oden; D A Hormuth; T E Yankeelov; R C Almeida
Journal:  Math Models Methods Appl Sci       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.817

4.  Integrated Biophysical Modeling and Image Analysis: Application to Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Andreas Mang; Spyridon Bakas; Shashank Subramanian; Christos Davatzikos; George Biros
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model that incorporates intra-tumoural heterogeneity to predict in vivo glioma growth.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Experimental method and statistical analysis to fit tumor growth model using SPECT/CT imaging: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Ivan Hidrovo; Joyoni Dey; Megan E Chesal; Dmytro Shumilov; Narayan Bhusal; J Michael Mathis
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-06

7.  Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Selection and Validation of Predictive Models of Radiation Effects on Tumor Growth Based on Noninvasive Imaging Data.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; J T Oden; B Wohlmuth; A Shahmoradi; D A Hormuth; T E Yankeelov; L Scarabosio; T Horger
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.756

9.  A fully coupled space-time multiscale modeling framework for predicting tumor growth.

Authors:  Mohammad Mamunur Rahman; Yusheng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov; J Tinsley Oden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 10.  Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; David A Hormuth; Matthew T McKenna; Xinzeng Feng; David A Ekrut; Anna Claudia M Resende; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.