Literature DB >> 24433723

Assessing reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Jennifer G Whisenant1, Gregory D Ayers2, Mary E Loveless3, Stephanie L Barnes4, Daniel C Colvin4, Thomas E Yankeelov5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as a surrogate biomarker of response in preclinical studies is increasing. However, before a biomarker can be reliably employed to assess treatment response, the reproducibility of the technique must be established. There is a paucity of literature that quantifies the reproducibility of DW-MRI in preclinical studies; thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate DW-MRI reproducibility in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test-Retest DW-MRI scans separated by approximately six hours were acquired from eleven athymic female mice with HER2+ xenografts using a pulsed gradient spin echo diffusion-weighted sequence with three b values [150, 500, and 800s/mm(2)]. Reproducibility was assessed for the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from tumor and muscle tissue regions.
RESULTS: The threshold to reflect a change in tumor physiology in a cohort of mice is defined by the 95% confidence interval (CI), which was±0.0972×10(-3)mm(2)/s (±11.8%) for mean tumor ADC. The repeatability coefficient defines this threshold for an individual mouse, which was±0.273×10(-3)mm(2)/s. The 95% CI and repeatability coefficient for mean ADC of muscle tissue were±0.0949×10(-3)mm(2)/s (±8.30%) and±0.266×10(-3)mm(2)/s, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Mean ADC of tumors is reproducible and appropriate for detecting treatment-induced changes on both an individual and mouse cohort basis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted MRI; Mouse; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24433723      PMCID: PMC3939718          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  30 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Diffusive sensitivity to muscle architecture: a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study of the human calf.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefan Maderwald; Kai Uffmann; Armin de Greiff; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Targeted anti-mitotic therapies: can we improve on tubulin agents?

Authors:  Jeffrey R Jackson; Denis R Patrick; Mohammed M Dar; Pearl S Huang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion MRI show rapid and dramatic changes in tumor microenvironment in response to inhibition of HIF-1alpha using PX-478.

Authors:  Bénédicte F Jordan; Matthew Runquist; Natarajan Raghunand; Amanda Baker; Ryan Williams; Lynn Kirkpatrick; Garth Powis; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Effects of 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid on human tumor microcirculation assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Gordon J S Rustin; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; J James Stirling; Michael Jameson; Paul Thompson; David Hough; Lindsey Gumbrell; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Analysis and correction of motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Human breast cancer cells selected for resistance to trastuzumab in vivo overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB ligands and remain dependent on the ErbB receptor network.

Authors:  Christoph A Ritter; Marianela Perez-Torres; Cammie Rinehart; Marta Guix; Teresa Dugger; Jeffrey A Engelman; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  16 in total

1.  Three-dimensional Image-based Mechanical Modeling for Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.756

2.  Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of modality independent elastography in a murine model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Katelyn M Flint; Violeta Sanchez; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model that incorporates intra-tumoural heterogeneity to predict in vivo glioma growth.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Incorporating drug delivery into an imaging-driven, mechanics-coupled reaction diffusion model for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: theory and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; David A Hormuth; Stephanie L Barnes; Xinzeng Feng; Wei Huang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; Stephanie L Barnes; Angela M Jarrett; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Jeffery J Luci; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; John Virostko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient is highly reproducible on preclinical imaging systems: Evidence from a seven-center multivendor study.

Authors:  Sabrina Doblas; Gilberto S Almeida; François-Xavier Blé; Philippe Garteiser; Benjamin A Hoff; Dominick J O McIntyre; Lydia Wachsmuth; Thomas L Chenevert; Cornelius Faber; John R Griffiths; Andreas H Jacobs; David M Morris; James P B O'Connor; Simon P Robinson; Bernard E Van Beers; John C Waterton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Multi-site clinical evaluation of DW-MRI as a treatment response metric for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Bing Ma; Dariya Malyarenko; Martin D Pickles; Kevin Heist; Norah L Henry; Anne F Schott; Colleen H Neal; Nola M Hylton; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Timothy D Johnson; Charles R Meyer; Thomas L Chenevert; Lindsay W Turnbull; Brian D Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Achraf Al Faraj; Abjal Pasha Shaik; Asma Sultana Shaik
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.