Literature DB >> 28827890

Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth.

E A B F Lima1, J T Oden1, D A Hormuth1, T E Yankeelov1,2,3, R C Almeida4.   

Abstract

This paper presents general approaches for addressing some of the most important issues in predictive computational oncology concerned with developing classes of predictive models of tumor growth. First, the process of developing mathematical models of vascular tumors evolving in the complex, heterogeneous, macroenvironment of living tissue; second, the selection of the most plausible models among these classes, given relevant observational data; third, the statistical calibration and validation of models in these classes, and finally, the prediction of key Quantities of Interest (QOIs) relevant to patient survival and the effect of various therapies. The most challenging aspects of this endeavor is that all of these issues often involve confounding uncertainties: in observational data, in model parameters, in model selection, and in the features targeted in the prediction. Our approach can be referred to as "model agnostic" in that no single model is advocated; rather, a general approach that explores powerful mixture-theory representations of tissue behavior while accounting for a range of relevant biological factors is presented, which leads to many potentially predictive models. Then representative classes are identified which provide a starting point for the implementation of OPAL, the Occam Plausibility Algorithm (OPAL) which enables the modeler to select the most plausible models (for given data) and to determine if the model is a valid tool for predicting tumor growth and morphology (in vivo). All of these approaches account for uncertainties in the model, the observational data, the model parameters, and the target QOI. We demonstrate these processes by comparing a list of models for tumor growth, including reaction-diffusion models, phase-fields models, and models with and without mechanical deformation effects, for glioma growth measured in murine experiments. Examples are provided that exhibit quite acceptable predictions of tumor growth in laboratory animals while demonstrating successful implementations of OPAL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  22E46; 53C35; 57S20; Predictive model; cancer; computational oncology; model calibration; systems biology

Year:  2016        PMID: 28827890      PMCID: PMC5560997          DOI: 10.1142/S021820251650055X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Models Methods Appl Sci        ISSN: 0218-2025            Impact factor:   3.817


  12 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids.

Authors:  G Helmlinger; P A Netti; H C Lichtenbeld; R J Melder; R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Nkiruka Atuegwu; David Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; John D Martin; Vikash P Chauhan; Saloni R Jain; Benjamin Diop-Frimpong; Nabeel Bardeesy; Barbara L Smith; Cristina R Ferrone; Francis J Hornicek; Yves Boucher; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Vito Quaranta; Katherine J Evans; Erin C Rericha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using a Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth--I Model and numerical method.

Authors:  S M Wise; J S Lowengrub; H B Frieboes; V Cristini
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Janet Tse; Rakesh K Jain; Lance L Munn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

2.  Coupling brain-tumor biophysical models and diffeomorphic image registration.

Authors:  Klaudius Scheufele; Andreas Mang; Amir Gholami; Christos Davatzikos; George Biros; Miriam Mehl
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  A continuum mechanical framework for modeling tumor growth and treatment in two- and three-phase systems.

Authors:  Cass T Miller; William G Gray; Bernhard A Schrefler
Journal:  Arch Appl Mech       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 4.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  Selection and Validation of Predictive Models of Radiation Effects on Tumor Growth Based on Noninvasive Imaging Data.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; J T Oden; B Wohlmuth; A Shahmoradi; D A Hormuth; T E Yankeelov; L Scarabosio; T Horger
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.756

6.  A Coupled Mass Transport and Deformation Theory of Multi-constituent Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Danial Faghihi; Xinzeng Feng; Ernesto A B F Lima; J Tinsley Oden; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Mech Phys Solids       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.471

Review 7.  Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; David A Hormuth; Matthew T McKenna; Xinzeng Feng; David A Ekrut; Anna Claudia M Resende; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Calibration of Multi-Parameter Models of Avascular Tumor Growth Using Time Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; N Ghousifam; A Ozkan; J T Oden; A Shahmoradi; M N Rylander; B Wohlmuth; T E Yankeelov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.

Authors:  Russell C Rockne; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Kristin R Swanson; James P Sluka; James A Glazier; Paul Macklin; David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; J Tinsley Oden; George Biros; Thomas E Yankeelov; Kit Curtius; Ibrahim Al Bakir; Dominik Wodarz; Natalia Komarova; Luis Aparicio; Mykola Bordyuh; Raul Rabadan; Stacey D Finley; Heiko Enderling; Jimmy Caudell; Eduardo G Moros; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Gatenby; Artem Kaznatcheev; Peter Jeavons; Nikhil Krishnan; Julia Pelesko; Raoul R Wadhwa; Nara Yoon; Daniel Nichol; Andriy Marusyk; Michael Hinczewski; Jacob G Scott
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.959

10.  Modeling of Glioma Growth With Mass Effect by Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Birkan Tunc; David Hormuth; George Biros; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.