OBJECTIVE: In heart failure populations without aortic stenosis (AS), the prognostic utility of multiple biomarkers in addition to clinical factors has been demonstrated. We aimed to determine whether multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are associated with mortality in patients with AS undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) independent of clinical factors. METHODS: From a prospective registry of patients with AS, 345 participants who were referred for and treated with AVR (transcatheter (n=183) or surgical (n=162)) were included. Eight biomarkers were measured on blood samples obtained prior to AVR: growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), soluble ST2 (sST2), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), galectin-3, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, myeloperoxidase, high-sensitivity C reactive protein and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Biomarkers were evaluated based on median value (high vs low) in a Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause mortality and a parsimonious group of biomarkers selected. Mean follow-up was 1.9±1.2 years; 91 patients died. RESULTS: Three biomarkers (GDF15, sST2 and NTproBNP) were retained in the model. One-year mortality was 5%, 12%, 18% and 33% for patients with 0 (n=79), 1 (n=96), 2 (n=87) and 3 (n=83) biomarkers elevated, respectively (p<0.001). After adjustment for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score, a greater number of elevated biomarkers was associated with increased mortality (referent: 0 elevated): 1 elevated (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.63, p=0.40), 2 elevated (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.24 to 6.74, p=0.014) and 3 elevated (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.97 to 10.71, p<0.001). Among patients at intermediate or high surgical risk (STS score ≥4), 1-year and 2-year mortality rates were 34% and 43% for patients with three biomarkers elevated versus 4% and 4% for patients with 0 biomarkers elevated. When added to the STS score, the number of biomarkers elevated provided a category-free net reclassification improvement of 64% at 1 year (p<0.001). The association between a greater number of elevated biomarkers and increased mortality after valve replacement was similar in the transcatheter and surgical AVR populations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential utility of multiple biomarkers to aid in risk stratification of patients with AS. Further studies are needed to evaluate their utility in clinical decision-making in specific AS populations. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: In heart failure populations without aortic stenosis (AS), the prognostic utility of multiple biomarkers in addition to clinical factors has been demonstrated. We aimed to determine whether multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are associated with mortality in patients with AS undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) independent of clinical factors. METHODS: From a prospective registry of patients with AS, 345 participants who were referred for and treated with AVR (transcatheter (n=183) or surgical (n=162)) were included. Eight biomarkers were measured on blood samples obtained prior to AVR: growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), soluble ST2 (sST2), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), galectin-3, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, myeloperoxidase, high-sensitivity C reactive protein and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Biomarkers were evaluated based on median value (high vs low) in a Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause mortality and a parsimonious group of biomarkers selected. Mean follow-up was 1.9±1.2 years; 91 patients died. RESULTS: Three biomarkers (GDF15, sST2 and NTproBNP) were retained in the model. One-year mortality was 5%, 12%, 18% and 33% for patients with 0 (n=79), 1 (n=96), 2 (n=87) and 3 (n=83) biomarkers elevated, respectively (p<0.001). After adjustment for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score, a greater number of elevated biomarkers was associated with increased mortality (referent: 0 elevated): 1 elevated (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.63, p=0.40), 2 elevated (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.24 to 6.74, p=0.014) and 3 elevated (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.97 to 10.71, p<0.001). Among patients at intermediate or high surgical risk (STS score ≥4), 1-year and 2-year mortality rates were 34% and 43% for patients with three biomarkers elevated versus 4% and 4% for patients with 0 biomarkers elevated. When added to the STS score, the number of biomarkers elevated provided a category-free net reclassification improvement of 64% at 1 year (p<0.001). The association between a greater number of elevated biomarkers and increased mortality after valve replacement was similar in the transcatheter and surgical AVR populations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential utility of multiple biomarkers to aid in risk stratification of patients with AS. Further studies are needed to evaluate their utility in clinical decision-making in specific AS populations. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2008-12-08
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Kristin McCloskey; J Eduardo Rame; Erin McIntosh; Puja Shahi; Daniel L Dries; W H Wilson Tang; Alan H B Wu; James C Fang; Rebecca Boxer; Nancy K Sweitzer; Wayne C Levy; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Tibor Kempf; Stephan von Haehling; Timo Peter; Tim Allhoff; Mariantonietta Cicoira; Wolfram Doehner; Piotr Ponikowski; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Piotr Rozentryt; Helmut Drexler; Stefan D Anker; Kai C Wollert Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Todd M Dewey; David Brown; William H Ryan; Morley A Herbert; Syma L Prince; Michael J Mack Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Sean M O'Brien; David M Shahian; Giovanni Filardo; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth R DeLong; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Eric D Peterson; Fred H Edwards; Richard P Anderson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Meagan E Stabler; Michael E Rezaee; Devin M Parker; Todd A MacKenzie; Andrew R Bohm; Anthony W DiScipio; David J Malenka; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Rami Abu-Alhayja'a; Nancy Côté; François Dagenais; Eric Novak; Pierre Voisine; Anthony Poulin; Benoit J Arsenault; Philippe Desmeules; Abdellaziz Dahou; Lionel Taster; Khitam Aldahoun; Yohan Bossé; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Juyong Brian Kim; Yukari Kobayashi; Kegan J Moneghetti; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Ingela Schnittger; Joseph C Wu; Gillian Murtagh; Agim Beshiri; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; David Liang; Alan C Yeung; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Jeffrey P Jacobs; Shama S Alam; Sherry L Owens; Devin M Parker; Michael Rezaee; Donald S Likosky; David M Shahian; Marshall L Jacobs; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Moritz Wyler von Ballmoos; Kevin Lobdell; Todd MacKenzie; Allen D Everett; Chirag R Parikh; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.330