BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 reflects activity of an interleukin-33-dependent cardioprotective signaling axis and is a diagnostic and prognostic marker in acute heart failure. The use of ST2 in chronic heart failure has not been well defined. Our objective was to determine whether plasma ST2 levels predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure in the context of current approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined the association between ST2 level and risk of death or transplantation in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1141 chronic heart failure outpatients. Adjusted Cox models, receiver operating characteristic analyses, and risk reclassification metrics were used to assess the value of ST2 in predicting risk beyond currently used factors. After a median of 2.8 years, 267 patients (23%) died or underwent heart transplantation. Patients in the highest ST2 tertile (ST2 >36.3 ng/mL) had a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the lowest tertile (ST2 ≤22.3 ng/mL), with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 4.7; P<0.0001) that remained significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9; P=0.002). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve for ST2 was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.79), which was similar to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (area under the curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.81; P=0.24 versus ST2) but lower than the Seattle Heart Failure Model (area under the curve, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85; P=0.014 versus ST2). Addition of ST2 and NT-proBNP to the Seattle Heart Failure Model reclassified 14.9% of patients into more appropriate risk categories (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: ST2 is a potent marker of risk in chronic heart failure and when used in combination with NT-proBNP offers moderate improvement in assessing prognosis beyond clinical risk scores.
BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 reflects activity of an interleukin-33-dependent cardioprotective signaling axis and is a diagnostic and prognostic marker in acute heart failure. The use of ST2 in chronic heart failure has not been well defined. Our objective was to determine whether plasma ST2 levels predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure in the context of current approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: We determined the association between ST2 level and risk of death or transplantation in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1141 chronic heart failure outpatients. Adjusted Cox models, receiver operating characteristic analyses, and risk reclassification metrics were used to assess the value of ST2 in predicting risk beyond currently used factors. After a median of 2.8 years, 267 patients (23%) died or underwent heart transplantation. Patients in the highest ST2 tertile (ST2 >36.3 ng/mL) had a markedly increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the lowest tertile (ST2 ≤22.3 ng/mL), with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 to 4.7; P<0.0001) that remained significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.9; P=0.002). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve for ST2 was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.79), which was similar to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (area under the curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.81; P=0.24 versus ST2) but lower than the Seattle Heart Failure Model (area under the curve, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85; P=0.014 versus ST2). Addition of ST2 and NT-proBNP to the Seattle Heart Failure Model reclassified 14.9% of patients into more appropriate risk categories (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS:ST2 is a potent marker of risk in chronic heart failure and when used in combination with NT-proBNP offers moderate improvement in assessing prognosis beyond clinical risk scores.
Authors: Kiang-Teck J Yeo; Alan H B Wu; Fred S Apple; Martin H Kroll; Robert H Christenson; Kent B Lewandrowski; Frank A Sedor; Anthony W Butch Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Robin A P Weir; Ashley M Miller; Grace E J Murphy; Suzanne Clements; Tracey Steedman; John M C Connell; Iain B McInnes; Henry J Dargie; John J V McMurray Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ellen O Weinberg; Masahisa Shimpo; Shelley Hurwitz; Shin-ichi Tominaga; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Richard T Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wayne C Levy; Dariush Mozaffarian; David T Linker; Santosh C Sutradhar; Stefan D Anker; Anne B Cropp; Inder Anand; Aldo Maggioni; Paul Burton; Mark D Sullivan; Bertram Pitt; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Douglas L Mann; Milton Packer Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Masahisa Shimpo; David A Morrow; Ellen O Weinberg; Marc S Sabatine; Sabina A Murphy; Elliott M Antman; Richard T Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marc S Sabatine; David A Morrow; Luke J Higgins; Catherine MacGillivray; Wei Guo; Christophe Bode; Nader Rifai; Christopher P Cannon; Robert E Gerszten; Richard T Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Meagan E Stabler; Michael E Rezaee; Devin M Parker; Todd A MacKenzie; Andrew R Bohm; Anthony W DiScipio; David J Malenka; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Jennifer E Ho; Wei-Yu Chen; Ming-Huei Chen; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Susan Cheng; Anahita Ghorbani; Erin Coglianese; Valur Emilsson; Andrew D Johnson; Stefan Walter; Nora Franceschini; Christopher J O'Donnell; Abbas Dehghan; Chen Lu; Daniel Levy; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Honghuang Lin; Janine F Felix; Eric R Schreiter; Ramachandran S Vasan; James L Januzzi; Richard T Lee; Thomas J Wang Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Rami Abu-Alhayja'a; Nancy Côté; François Dagenais; Eric Novak; Pierre Voisine; Anthony Poulin; Benoit J Arsenault; Philippe Desmeules; Abdellaziz Dahou; Lionel Taster; Khitam Aldahoun; Yohan Bossé; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Kai C Wollert; Martin G Larson; Erin Coglianese; Elizabeth L McCabe; Susan Cheng; Jennifer E Ho; Michael G Fradley; Anahita Ghorbani; Vanessa Xanthakis; Tibor Kempf; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; James L Januzzi Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Erin E Coglianese; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Jennifer E Ho; Anahita Ghorbani; Elizabeth L McCabe; Susan Cheng; Michael G Fradley; Dana Kretschman; Wei Gao; George O'Connor; Thomas J Wang; James L Januzzi Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Benjamin French; Le Wang; Bonnie Ky; Jeffrey Brandimarto; Anupam Basuray; James C Fang; Nancy K Sweitzer; Thomas P Cappola Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 5.712