Literature DB >> 30409274

Multimarker Approach to Identify Patients With Higher Mortality and Rehospitalization Rate After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Brian R Lindman1, Marie-Annick Clavel2, Rami Abu-Alhayja'a2, Nancy Côté2, François Dagenais2, Eric Novak3, Pierre Voisine2, Anthony Poulin2, Benoit J Arsenault2, Philippe Desmeules2, Abdellaziz Dahou2, Lionel Taster2, Khitam Aldahoun2, Yohan Bossé2, Patrick Mathieu2, Philippe Pibarot2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate whether a multimarker approach might identify patients with higher mortality and hospitalization rates after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS).
BACKGROUND: The society valve guidelines include accepted triggers for AVR in patients with severe asymptomatic AS, but circulating biomarkers do not have a clear role.
METHOD: From a prospective registry of patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2000 and 2012, 665 treated with surgical AVR (441 isolated) were evaluated. Seven biomarkers were measured on blood samples obtained before AVR. Biomarker levels were adjusted to account for the influence of age, sex, body mass index, and renal function; the median was used to determine an elevated value. Endpoints included all-cause mortality and all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Mean follow-up was 10.7 years and 299 (45%) died.
RESULTS: Patients with 0 to 1, 2 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 biomarkers elevated had 5-year mortality of 10%, 12%, 24%, and 33%, respectively, and 10-year mortality of 24%, 35%, 58%, and 71%, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). The association between an increasing number of elevated biomarkers and increased all-cause mortality was observed among those with minimal symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class I or II) and those with a low N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (p < 0.01 for both). Compared with those with 0 to 1 biomarkers elevated, patients with 4 to 6 or 7 biomarkers elevated had an increased hazard of mortality after adjustment for clinical risk scores (p < 0.01) and a 2- to 3-fold higher rate of all-cause and cardiovascular rehospitalization after AVR. Similar findings were obtained when evaluating cardiovascular mortality. Among patients with no or minimal symptoms, 42% had ≥4 biomarkers elevated.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe AS treated with surgical AVR, an increasing number of elevated biomarkers of cardiovascular stress was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and a higher rate of repeat hospitalization. A multimarker approach may be useful in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients with severe AS to optimize surgical timing.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; biomarkers; hospitalization; mortality; risk stratification; surgical aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30409274      PMCID: PMC6233732          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  21 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yanto Sandy Tjang; Yvonne van Hees; Reiner Körfer; Diederick E Grobbee; Geert J M G van der Heijden
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time.

Authors:  M Schemper; T L Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-08

3.  Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Jared G Breyley; Joel D Schilling; Anna M Vatterott; Alan Zajarias; Hersh S Maniar; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon; Jennifer S Lawton; Brian F Gage; Marc A Sintek; Alejandro Aquino; Christopher L Holley; Neil M Patel; Cassandra Lawler; John M Lasala; Eric Novak
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Kristin McCloskey; J Eduardo Rame; Erin McIntosh; Puja Shahi; Daniel L Dries; W H Wilson Tang; Alan H B Wu; James C Fang; Rebecca Boxer; Nancy K Sweitzer; Wayne C Levy; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Thomas P Cappola
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Prognostic utility of growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Tibor Kempf; Stephan von Haehling; Timo Peter; Tim Allhoff; Mariantonietta Cicoira; Wolfram Doehner; Piotr Ponikowski; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Piotr Rozentryt; Helmut Drexler; Stefan D Anker; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Nicholas A Boon; David E Newby
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Natriuretic peptides predict symptom-free survival and postoperative outcome in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Jutta Bergler-Klein; Ursula Klaar; Maria Heger; Raphael Rosenhek; Gerald Mundigler; Harald Gabriel; Thomas Binder; Richard Pacher; Gerald Maurer; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts outcome after hospital discharge in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Paulo Bettencourt; Ana Azevedo; Joana Pimenta; Fernando Friões; Susana Ferreira; António Ferreira
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Impact of Preprocedural B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels on the Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Yigal Abramowitz; Tarun Chakravarty; Hasan Jilaihawi; Chin Lee; Justin Cox; Rahul P Sharma; Geeteshwar Mangat; Wen Cheng; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of new and old biomarkers in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Klein; Ingo Nolte; José Luis Granados-Soler; Philipp Lietz; Maximiliane Sehn; Jonathan Friedemann Raue; Karl Rohn; Eva-Maria Packeiser; Jan-Peter Bach
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Biomarkers of Cardiac Damage and Stress in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Elliot J Stein; William F Fearon; Sammy Elmariah; Juyong B Kim; Samir Kapadia; Dharam J Kumbhani; Linda Gillam; Brian Whisenant; Nishath Quader; Alan Zajarias; Frederick G Welt; Anthony A Bavry; Megan Coylewright; Robert N Piana; Ravinder R Mallugari; Daniel E Clark; Jay N Patel; Holly Gonzales; Deepak K Gupta; Anna Vatterott; Natalie Jackson; Shi Huang; Brian R Lindman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Urea level is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Dan Haberman; Gil Chernin; Valery Meledin; Meital Zikry; Mony Shuvy; Gera Gandelman; Sorel Goland; Jacob George; Sara Shimoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biomarkers Associated with Mortality in Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Madeline White; Ranu Baral; Alisdair Ryding; Vasiliki Tsampasian; Thuwarahan Ravindrarajah; Pankaj Garg; Konstantinos C Koskinas; Allan Clark; Vassilios S Vassiliou
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.