| Literature DB >> 26036857 |
Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa1,2, Mireille Claustres3, Ros J Hastings4, Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts5, Gabrielle Christenhusz6, Maurizio Genuardi7, Béla Melegh8, Anne Cambon-Thomsen9, Philippos Patsalis10, Joris Vermeesch11, Martina C Cornel12, Beverly Searle13, Aarno Palotie14, Ettore Capoluongo15, Borut Peterlin16, Xavier Estivill17,18,19, Peter N Robinson20,21,22.
Abstract
In 2013, the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) examined the issue of incidental findings in whole exome and whole genome sequencing, and introduced recommendations to search for, evaluate and report medically actionable variants in a set of 56 genes. At a debate held during the 2014 European Society for Human Genetics Conference (ESHG) in Milan, Italy, the first author of that paper presented this view in a debate session that did not end with a conclusive vote from the mainly European audience for or against reporting back actionable incidental findings. In this meeting report, we elaborate on the discussions held during a special meeting hosted at the ESHG in 2013 from posing the question 'How to reach a (European) consensus on reporting incidental findings and unclassified variants in diagnostic next generation sequencing'. We ask whether an European consensus exists on the reporting of incidental findings in genome diagnostics, and present a series of key issues that require discussion at both a national and European level in order to develop recommendations for handling incidental findings and unclassified variants in line with the legal and cultural particularities of individual European member states.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26036857 PMCID: PMC4795187 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246