Literature DB >> 29330544

Perceptions of legislation relating to the sharing of genomic biobank results with donors-a survey of BBMRI-ERIC biobanks.

Minna Brunfeldt1, Harriet Teare2, Sirpa Soini3, Helena Kääriäinen4.   

Abstract

Biobanks accumulate huge amounts of research findings, including participants' genomic data. Increasingly this leads to biobanks receiving research results that could be of clinical significance to biobank participants. The EU Horizon 2020 Project 'Genetics Clinic of the Future' surveyed European biobanks' perceptions of the legal and regulatory requirements for communicating individual research results to donors. The goal was to gain background knowledge for possible future guidelines, especially relating to the consent process. The Survey was implemented using a web-based Webropol tool. The questionnaire was sent at the end of 2015 to 351 European biobanks in 13 countries that are members of BBMRI-ERIC (Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium). Seventy-two biobanks responded to the survey, representing each of the 13 BBMRI Member States. Respondents were mainly individuals responsible for the governance of biobanks. The replies indicate that the majority of the respondents thought that their national legislation allowed them to contact participants to communicate results, and that research participants had the right to request their results. However, respondents' understanding of their national legislation varied even within member states. Our results indicate that legislation applied to biobanks in many countries may be scattered and difficult to interpret. In BBMRI-ERIC, there is an ongoing discussion about the need for European recommendations on sharing genomic biobank results with donors, which may pave the way for more coherent global guidelines. Our results form a basis for this work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330544      PMCID: PMC5839019          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  11 in total

Review 1.  Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati; Karine Sénécal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome.

Authors:  A Haukkala; E Kujala; P Alha; V Salomaa; S Koskinen; H Swan; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.

Authors:  Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Mireille Claustres; Ros J Hastings; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Gabrielle Christenhusz; Maurizio Genuardi; Béla Melegh; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Philippos Patsalis; Joris Vermeesch; Martina C Cornel; Beverly Searle; Aarno Palotie; Ettore Capoluongo; Borut Peterlin; Xavier Estivill; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Biobanks as a Central Part of the Finnish Growth and Genomic Strategies: How to Balance Privacy in an Innovation Ecosystem?

Authors:  Sirpa Soini
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Brittney N Crock; Brian Van Ness; Frances Lawrenz; Jeffrey P Kahn; Laura M Beskow; Mildred K Cho; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Ralph Hall; Judy Illes; Moira Keane; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Isaac S Kohane; Bonnie Leroy; Karen J Maschke; William McGeveran; Pilar Ossorio; Lisa S Parker; Gloria M Petersen; Henry S Richardson; Joan A Scott; Sharon F Terry; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Deborah Mascalzoni; Sirpa Soini; Helena Machado; Jane Kaye; Heidi Beate Bentzen; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Flavio D'Abramo; Michał Witt; Geneviève Schamps; Višnja Katić; Dusanca Krajnovic; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Amy L McGuire; Mildred Cho; Janet A Buchanan; Michael M Burgess; Ursula Danilczyk; Christina M Diaz; Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Shane K Green; Marc A Hodosh; Eric T Juengst; Jane Kaye; Laurence Kedes; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Trudo Lemmens; Eric M Meslin; Juli Murphy; Robert L Nussbaum; Margaret Otlowski; Daryl Pullman; Peter N Ray; Jeremy Sugarman; Michael Timmons
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  International ethics harmonization and the global alliance for genomics and health.

Authors:  Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Gratien Dalpé; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  User-focused data sharing agreements: a foundation for the genomic future.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-10-01

3.  Biobanks and Individual Health Related Findings: from an Obstacle to an Incentive.

Authors:  Jurate Lekstutiene; Søren Holm; Eugenijus Gefenas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Simulating the Genetics Clinic of the Future - whether undergoing whole-genome sequencing shapes professional attitudes.

Authors:  Minna Brunfeldt; Harriet Teare; Daan Schuurbiers; Daniela Steinberger; Elianne Gerrits; Marleena Vornanen; Nine Knoers; Helena Kääriäinen; Terry Vrijenhoek
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.