Literature DB >> 29326429

Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing: Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.

Guido De Wert1, Björn Heindryckx2, Guido Pennings3, Angus Clarke4, Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter5, Carla G van El6, Francesca Forzano7, Mariëtte Goddijn8, Heidi C Howard9, Dragica Radojkovic10, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag11, Wybo Dondorp12, Basil C Tarlatzis13, Martina C Cornel6.   

Abstract

Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, preclinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g., gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g., safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29326429      PMCID: PMC5891502          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0077-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  71 in total

1.  Protecting the endangered human: toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations.

Authors:  George J Annas; Lori B Andrews; Rosario M Isasi
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2002

2.  What if stem cells turn into embryos in a dish?

Authors:  Martin F Pera; Guido de Wert; Wybo Dondorp; Robin Lovell-Badge; Christine L Mummery; Megan Munsie; Patrick P Tam
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  IVF: regulation or prohibition?

Authors:  A McLaren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Reconstitution in vitro of the entire cycle of the mouse female germ line.

Authors:  Orie Hikabe; Nobuhiko Hamazaki; Go Nagamatsu; Yayoi Obata; Yuji Hirao; Norio Hamada; So Shimamoto; Takuya Imamura; Kinichi Nakashima; Mitinori Saitou; Katsuhiko Hayashi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Jun Zhang; Hongya Wu; Jianying Wang; Ke Ma; Zheng Li; Xueguang Zhang; Pumin Zhang; Xingxu Huang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Human gene therapy: why draw a line?

Authors:  W F Anderson
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1989-12

8.  Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells.

Authors:  Waseem Qasim; Hong Zhan; Sujith Samarasinghe; Stuart Adams; Persis Amrolia; Sian Stafford; Katie Butler; Christine Rivat; Gary Wright; Kathy Somana; Sara Ghorashian; Danielle Pinner; Gul Ahsan; Kimberly Gilmour; Giovanna Lucchini; Sarah Inglott; William Mifsud; Robert Chiesa; Karl S Peggs; Lucas Chan; Farzin Farzeneh; Adrian J Thrasher; Ajay Vora; Martin Pule; Paul Veys
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Efficient Mitochondrial Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Areum Jo; Sangwoo Ham; Gum Hwa Lee; Yun-Il Lee; SangSeong Kim; Yun-Song Lee; Joo-Ho Shin; Yunjong Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Modulating mitochondrial quality in disease transmission: towards enabling mitochondrial DNA disease carriers to have healthy children.

Authors:  Alan Diot; Eszter Dombi; Tiffany Lodge; Chunyan Liao; Karl Morten; Janet Carver; Dagan Wells; Tim Child; Iain G Johnston; Suzannah Williams; Joanna Poulton
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.407

View more
  4 in total

1.  Human germline gene editing: Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.

Authors:  Guido de Wert; Guido Pennings; Angus Clarke; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Mariëtte Goddijn; Björn Heindryckx; Heidi C Howard; Dragica Radojkovic; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Basil C Tarlatzis; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Genetics Matters: Voyaging from the Past into the Future of Humanity and Sustainability.

Authors:  Acga Cheng; Jennifer Ann Harikrishna; Charles S Redwood; Lei Cheng Lit; Swapan K Nath; Kek Heng Chua
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Human germline gene editing. Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.

Authors:  Guido de Wert; Guido Pennings; Angus Clarke; Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Mariëtte Goddijn; Björn Heindryckx; Heidi C Howard; Dragica Radojkovic; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Basil C Tarlatzis; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-01-12

4.  Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alix Lenia V Hammerstein; Matthias Eggel; Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.