Literature DB >> 26036679

[ICD leads].

Carsten W Israel1, Mohamed Karim Sheta.   

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads have to fulfill particular requirements: safe pacing and sensing, detection, and termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, if necessary by (multiple) high-energy shocks. At the same time, their implantation has to be simple, they need to provide excellent long-term stability and they must be completely and safely extractable. Numerous technical developments have enabled currently available ICD leads to fulfill these expectations to a high extent. However, some changes of lead design, materials, and manufacturing processes have led to increased lead failure, especially in two lead models (Medtronic Sprint Fidelis®, St. Jude Medical Riata®). The high rate of lead failure was identified only several years after market release, in part because there are no appropriate registries of ICD leads. This review presents background and developments of ICD lead technology and their association with the clinical usage of ICD therapy. To also benefit patients with only slightly-to-moderately increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, optimum ICD therapy requires optimal leads and sufficiently experienced implanters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26036679     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-015-0375-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  34 in total

1.  Clinical predictors of Fidelis lead failure: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Ratika Parkash; Derek V Exner; Vidal Essebag; Jeffrey S Healey; Atul Verma; Benoit Coutu; Teresa Kus; Iqwal Mangat; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Pablo Nery; George Wells; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Failure rates of single- versus dual-coil nonrecalled sprint quattro defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Nasir Shariff; Krishna Alluri; Samir Saba
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Insight into the mechanism of failure of the Riata lead under advisory.

Authors:  Ratika Parkash; Stanley Tung; Jean Champagne; Jeffrey S Healey; Bernard Thibault; Douglas Cameron; Anthony Tang; Sean Connors; Marianne Beardsall; Iqwal Mangat; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Satish Toal; Derek Exner; Raymond Yee; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Safety and efficacy of internal transjugular approach for transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Luca Segreti; Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Stefano Viani; Luca Paperini; Raffaele De Lucia; Adriano Boem; Dianora Levorato; Ezio Soldati
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.

Authors:  Andrzej Lubiński; Ewa Lewicka-Nowak; Agnieszka Zienciuk; Tomasz Królak; Maciej Kempa; Anna Pazdyga; Grzegorz Raczak; Grazyna Swiatecka
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.108

6.  Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction.

Authors:  Luca Segreti; Andrea Di Cori; Ezio Soldati; Giulio Zucchelli; Stefano Viani; Luca Paperini; Raffaele De Lucia; Giovanni Coluccia; Sergio Valsecchi; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Clinical impact, safety, and efficacy of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads in MADIT-CRT.

Authors:  Valentina Kutyifa; Anne-Christine Huth Ruwald; Mehmet K Aktas; Christian Jons; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Laszlo Geller; Bela Merkely; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-25

8.  First clinical experience with the new four-pole standard connector for high-voltage ICD leads. Early results of a multicenter comparison with conventional implant outcomes.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Massimo Mantica; Germana Panattoni; Matteo Santamaria; Quintino Parisi; Domenico Sergi; Lida P Papavasileiou; Luca Santini; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Detection and management of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure: incidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Mark A Wood; Richard K Shepard; Henry F Clemo; Tim Vaughn; Keith Holloman; Marlene Dow; Jeanne Leffler; Athula Abeyratne; Dave Verness
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; Linda M Kallinen; Adrian K Almquist; Charles C Gornick; William T Katsiyiannis
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Multiple inappropriate defibrillator shocks due to insulation failure of a Biotronik Linox defibrillator lead with externalized conductor].

Authors:  Hamdi Elfarra; Rainer Moosdorf; Leszek Rybinski; Wolfram Grimm
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.