Sungheon G Kim1,2, Li Feng1,2,3, Robert Grimm4,5, Melanie Freed1,2, Kai Tobias Block1,2, Daniel K Sodickson1,2, Linda Moy1,2, Ricardo Otazo1,2. 1. Center for Advanced Imaging and Innovation and Research (CAI2R) and. 2. Department of Radiology, Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine New York, New York, USA. 3. Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine New York, New York, USA. 4. Pattern Recognition Lab, FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Siemens AG Healthcare MR, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of temporal sparsity regularization and radial undersampling on compressed sensing reconstruction of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, using the iterative Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (iGRASP) MRI technique in the setting of breast cancer evaluation. METHODS: DCE-MRI examinations of the breast (n = 7) were conducted using iGRASP at 3 Tesla. Images were reconstructed with five different radial undersampling schemes corresponding to temporal resolutions between 2 and 13.4 s/frame and with four different weights for temporal sparsity regularization (λ = 0.1, 0.5, 2, and 6 times of noise level). Image similarity to time-averaged reference images was assessed by two breast radiologists and using quantitative metrics. Temporal similarity was measured in terms of wash-in slope and contrast kinetic model parameters. RESULTS: iGRASP images reconstructed with λ = 2 and 5.1 s/frame had significantly (P < 0.05) higher similarity to time-averaged reference images than the images with other reconstruction parameters (mutual information (MI) >5%), in agreement with the assessment of two breast radiologists. Higher undersampling (temporal resolution < 5.1 s/frame) required stronger temporal sparsity regularization (λ ≥ 2) to remove streaking aliasing artifacts (MI > 23% between λ = 2 and 0.5). The difference between the kinetic-model transfer rates of benign and malignant groups decreased as temporal resolution decreased (82% between 2 and 13.4 s/frame). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates objective spatial and temporal similarity measures can be used to assess the influence of sparsity constraint and undersampling in compressed sensing DCE-MRI and also shows that the iGRASP method provides the flexibility of optimizing these reconstruction parameters in the postprocessing stage using the same acquired data.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of temporal sparsity regularization and radial undersampling on compressed sensing reconstruction of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, using the iterative Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (iGRASP) MRI technique in the setting of breast cancer evaluation. METHODS:DCE-MRI examinations of the breast (n = 7) were conducted using iGRASP at 3 Tesla. Images were reconstructed with five different radial undersampling schemes corresponding to temporal resolutions between 2 and 13.4 s/frame and with four different weights for temporal sparsity regularization (λ = 0.1, 0.5, 2, and 6 times of noise level). Image similarity to time-averaged reference images was assessed by two breast radiologists and using quantitative metrics. Temporal similarity was measured in terms of wash-in slope and contrast kinetic model parameters. RESULTS: iGRASP images reconstructed with λ = 2 and 5.1 s/frame had significantly (P < 0.05) higher similarity to time-averaged reference images than the images with other reconstruction parameters (mutual information (MI) >5%), in agreement with the assessment of two breast radiologists. Higher undersampling (temporal resolution < 5.1 s/frame) required stronger temporal sparsity regularization (λ ≥ 2) to remove streaking aliasing artifacts (MI > 23% between λ = 2 and 0.5). The difference between the kinetic-model transfer rates of benign and malignant groups decreased as temporal resolution decreased (82% between 2 and 13.4 s/frame). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates objective spatial and temporal similarity measures can be used to assess the influence of sparsity constraint and undersampling in compressed sensing DCE-MRI and also shows that the iGRASP method provides the flexibility of optimizing these reconstruction parameters in the postprocessing stage using the same acquired data.
Authors: Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Daniel Kim; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Ricardo Otazo; Li Feng; Daniel K Sodickson; Vivian S Lee Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: T A Cashen; J C Carr; W Shin; M T Walker; S F Futterer; A Shaibani; R M McCarthy; T J Carroll Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Li Feng; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Sungheon Kim; Jian Xu; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Laura Heacock; Alana A Lewin; Yiming Gao; James S Babb; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; Neeti Bagadiya; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Laura Heacock; Yiming Gao; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; James S Babb; Tobias K Block; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Nathaniel E Margolis; Linda Moy; Eric E Sigmund; Melanie Freed; Jason McKellop; Amy N Melsaether; Sungheon Gene Kim Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Nicole Wake; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Koji Fujimoto; Linda Moy; Daniel K Sodickson; Sungheon Gene Kim Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Thomas Benkert; Ye Tian; Chenchan Huang; Edward V R DiBella; Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.668