Thomas Benkert1, Ye Tian2,3, Chenchan Huang1, Edward V R DiBella2, Hersh Chandarana1, Li Feng1. 1. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), and Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI reconstruction requires gridding and regridding to transform data between radial and Cartesian k-space. These operations are repeatedly performed in each iteration, which makes the reconstruction computationally demanding. This work aimed to accelerate GRASP reconstruction using self-calibrating GRAPPA operator gridding (GROG) and to validate its performance in clinical imaging. METHODS: GROG is an alternative gridding approach based on parallel imaging, in which k-space data acquired on a non-Cartesian grid are shifted onto a Cartesian k-space grid using information from multicoil arrays. For iterative non-Cartesian image reconstruction, GROG is performed only once as a preprocessing step. Therefore, the subsequent iterative reconstruction can be performed directly in Cartesian space, which significantly reduces computational burden. Here, a framework combining GROG with GRASP (GROG-GRASP) is first optimized and then compared with standard GRASP reconstruction in 22 prostate patients. RESULTS: GROG-GRASP achieved approximately 4.2-fold reduction in reconstruction time compared with GRASP (∼333 min versus ∼78 min) while maintaining image quality (structural similarity index ≈ 0.97 and root mean square error ≈ 0.007). Visual image quality assessment by two experienced radiologists did not show significant differences between the two reconstruction schemes. With a graphics processing unit implementation, image reconstruction time can be further reduced to approximately 14 min. CONCLUSION: The GRASP reconstruction can be substantially accelerated using GROG. This framework is promising toward broader clinical application of GRASP and other iterative non-Cartesian reconstruction methods. Magn Reson Med 80:286-293, 2018.
PURPOSE: Golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI reconstruction requires gridding and regridding to transform data between radial and Cartesian k-space. These operations are repeatedly performed in each iteration, which makes the reconstruction computationally demanding. This work aimed to accelerate GRASP reconstruction using self-calibrating GRAPPA operator gridding (GROG) and to validate its performance in clinical imaging. METHODS: GROG is an alternative gridding approach based on parallel imaging, in which k-space data acquired on a non-Cartesian grid are shifted onto a Cartesian k-space grid using information from multicoil arrays. For iterative non-Cartesian image reconstruction, GROG is performed only once as a preprocessing step. Therefore, the subsequent iterative reconstruction can be performed directly in Cartesian space, which significantly reduces computational burden. Here, a framework combining GROG with GRASP (GROG-GRASP) is first optimized and then compared with standard GRASP reconstruction in 22 prostate patients. RESULTS:GROG-GRASP achieved approximately 4.2-fold reduction in reconstruction time compared with GRASP (∼333 min versus ∼78 min) while maintaining image quality (structural similarity index ≈ 0.97 and root mean square error ≈ 0.007). Visual image quality assessment by two experienced radiologists did not show significant differences between the two reconstruction schemes. With a graphics processing unit implementation, image reconstruction time can be further reduced to approximately 14 min. CONCLUSION: The GRASP reconstruction can be substantially accelerated using GROG. This framework is promising toward broader clinical application of GRASP and other iterative non-Cartesian reconstruction methods. Magn Reson Med 80:286-293, 2018.
Authors: Jing Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Noel C F Codella; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ganesh Adluru; Chris McGann; Peter Speier; Eugene G Kholmovski; Akram Shaaban; Edward V R Dibella Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Brent Wilson; Alexander Ross; Ravi Ranjan; Edward DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Li Feng; Liliana E Ma; Daming Shen; Kai Tobias Block; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Daniel Kim Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jason Kraig Mendes; Ganesh Adluru; Devavrat Likhite; Merlin J Fair; Peter D Gatehouse; Ye Tian; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Jeremy D Collins; Pascale J Aouad; Ali M Serhal; Marc D Lindley; Jianing Pang; Nivedita K Naresh; James C Carr; Daniel Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Mark Ibrahim; Leif Jensen; Joyce D Schroeder; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240