Literature DB >> 26028995

Finding the Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: The 4Kscore Is a Novel Blood Test That Can Accurately Identify the Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

Sanoj Punnen1, Nicola Pavan1, Dipen J Parekh1.   

Abstract

Better biomarkers that can discriminate between aggressive and indolent phenotypes of prostate cancer are urgently needed. In the first 20 years of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era, screening for prostate cancer has successfully reduced prostate cancer mortality, but has led to significant problems with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. As a result, many men are subjected to unnecessary prostate biopsies and overtreatment of indolent cancer in order to save one man from dying of prostate cancer. A novel blood test known as the 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Lab, Nashville, TN) incorporates a panel of four kallikrein protein biomarkers (total PSA, free PSA, intact PSA, and human kallikrein-related peptidase 2) and other clinical information in an algorithm that provides a percent risk for a high-grade (Gleason score ≥ 7) cancer on biopsy. In 10 peer-reviewed publications, the four kallikrein biomarkers and algorithm of the 4Kscore Test have been shown to improve the prediction not only of biopsy histopathology, but also surgical pathology and occurrence of aggressive, metastatic disease. Recently, a blinded prospective trial of the 4Kscore Test was conducted across the United States among 1012 men. The 4Kscore Test replicated previous European results showing accuracy in predicting biopsy outcome of Gleason score ≥ 7. In a recent case-control study nested within a population-based cohort from Västerbotten, Sweden, the four kallikrein biomarkers of the 4Kscore Test also predicted the risk for aggressive prostate cancer that metastasized within 20 years after the test was administered. These results indicate that men with an abnormal PSA or digital rectal examination result, and for whom an initial or repeat prostate biopsy is being considered, would benefit from a reflex 4Kscore Test to add important information to the clinical decision-making process. A high-risk 4Kscore Test result may be used to select men with a high probability of aggressive prostate cancer who would benefit from a biopsy of the prostate to prevent an adverse and potentially lethal outcome from prostate cancer. Men with a low 4Kscore Test result may safely defer biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; High-grade prostate cancer; Prostate cancer; Screening

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028995      PMCID: PMC4444768     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  42 in total

1.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Floyd J Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Angel Cronin; Monique Roobol; Caroline Savage; Mari Peltola; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Fritz Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Kallikrein-related peptidases in prostate, breast, and ovarian cancers: from pathobiology to clinical relevance.

Authors:  Margaritis Avgeris; Konstantinos Mavridis; Andreas Scorilas
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.915

5.  A panel of kallikrein marker predicts prostate cancer in a large, population-based cohort followed for 15 years without screening.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Amit Gupta; Caroline J Savage; Kim Pettersson; Anders Dahlin; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Manjer; Peter T Scardino; David Ulmert; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Discrimination of benign from malignant prostatic disease by selective measurements of single chain, intact free prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Paulina Nurmikko; Alexander Haese; Kim Pettersson; Markus Graefen; Peter Hammerer; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  A Gupta; M J Roobol; C J Savage; M Peltola; K Pettersson; P T Scardino; A J Vickers; F H Schröder; H Lilja
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  26 in total

1.  Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Authors:  Stephen M Zappala; Peter T Scardino; David Okrongly; Vincent Linder; Yan Dong
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

2.  The STHLM3 prostate cancer diagnostic study: calibration, clarification, and comments.

Authors:  Martin Eklund; Henrik Grönberg; Tobias Nordström
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Use of the 4Kscore test to predict the risk of aggressive prostate cancer prior to prostate biopsy: Overall cost savings and improved quality of care to the us healthcare system.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Yan Dong; Vincent Linder; Stephen Zappala
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 4.  Current Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jamil S Syed; Juan Javier-Desloges; Stephanie Tatzel; Ansh Bhagat; Kevin A Nguyen; Kevin Hwang; Sarah Kim; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017.

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  The Use of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment.

Authors:  Ashley V Alford; Joseph M Brito; Kamlesh K Yadav; Shalini S Yadav; Ashutosh K Tewari; Joseph Renzulli
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

8.  PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER.

Authors:  David J VanderWeele; Baris Turkbey; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 9.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Semi-automated PIRADS scoring via mpMRI analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil J Dhinagar; William Speier; Karthik V Sarma; Alex Raman; Adam Kinnaird; Steven S Raman; Leonard S Marks; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.