Literature DB >> 26954332

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Jeffrey J Tosoian1, H Ballentine Carter1, Abbey Lepor2, Stacy Loeb2,3,4.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Early diagnosis and curative treatment seem to improve survival in men with unfavourable-risk cancers, but significant concerns exist regarding the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men with lower-risk cancers. To this end, active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a primary management strategy in men with favourable-risk disease, and contemporary data suggest that use of AS has increased worldwide. Although published surveillance cohorts differ by protocol, reported rates of metastatic disease and prostate-cancer-specific mortality are exceedingly low in the intermediate term (5-10 years). Such outcomes seem to be closely associated with programme-specific criteria for selection, monitoring, and intervention, suggesting that AS--like other management strategies--could be individualized based on the level of risk acceptable to patients in light of their personal preferences. Additional data are needed to better establish the risks associated with AS and to identify patient-specific characteristics that could modify prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26954332      PMCID: PMC4940050          DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  99 in total

1.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Seth K Bechis; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Kristell Acosta; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Impact of age on quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Janet E Cowan; Shoujun Zhao; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in African American men: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Brian D Odom; M C Mir; Scott Hughes; Cedric Senechal; Alexis Santy; Remi Eyraud; Andrew J Stephenson; Kelly Ylitalo; Ranko Miocinovic
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Cell cycle progression score and treatment decisions in prostate cancer: results from an ongoing registry.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Mark C Scholz; Ashok J Kar; Jeffrey E Fegan; Abebe Haregewoin; Rajesh R Kaldate; Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Erik Holmberg; Ali Khatami; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy in the active surveillance era.

Authors:  Alyssa S Louis; Robin Kalnin; Manjula Maganti; Melania Pintilie; Andrew G Matthew; Antonio Finelli; Alexandre R Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; Girish Kulkarni; Robert Hamilton; Michael Jewett; Michael Robinette; Shabbir M H Alibhai; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Prostate specific antigen velocity risk count predicts biopsy reclassification for men with very low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Zhaoyong Feng; Patricia Landis; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The impact of baseline [-2]proPSA-related indices on the prediction of pathological reclassification at 1 year during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: the Japanese multicenter study cohort.

Authors:  Hiromi Hirama; Mikio Sugimoto; Kazuto Ito; Taizo Shiraishi; Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.553

View more
  69 in total

1.  Baseline and longitudinal plasma caveolin-1 level as a biomarker in active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; John W Davis; Brian F Chapin; John F Ward; Curtis A Pettaway; Louis L Pisters; Neema Navai; Mary F Achim; Xuemei Wang; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Seungtaek Choi; Deborah Kuban; Patricia Troncoso; Sam Hanash; Timothy C Thompson; Jeri Kim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nima Nassiri; Daniel J Margolis; Shyam Natarajan; Devi S Sharma; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Amy S Leonardson; Donna Ankerst; Roman Gulati; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce J Trock; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Laurence H Klotz; Alexandre Mamedov; David F Penson; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Chromatin-Associated Protein SIN3B Prevents Prostate Cancer Progression by Inducing Senescence.

Authors:  Anthony J Bainor; Fang-Ming Deng; Yu Wang; Peng Lee; David J Cantor; Susan K Logan; Gregory David
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Prostate cancer: Screening and treatment: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Fred Saad
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Use, Outcomes, Imaging, and Diagnostic Tools.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

Review 7.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.

Authors:  Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  Active Surveillance Versus Watchful Waiting for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Model to Inform Decisions.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Qinlian Zhou; Uwe Siebert; Ursula Rochau; Beate Jahn; Nikolai Mühlberger; H Ballentine Carter; Herbert Lepor; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Active surveillance of prostate cancer: Current state of practice and utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ridwan Alam; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein; Jeffrey J Tosoian
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.