Literature DB >> 33623103

Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

James L Liu1, Hiten D Patel2,3, Nora M Haney2, Jonathan I Epstein2,4, Alan W Partin2.   

Abstract

Early identification and management of prostate cancer completely changed with the discovery of prostate-specific antigen. However, improved detection has also led to overdiagnosis and consequently overtreatment of patients with low-risk disease. Strategies for the management of patients using active surveillance - the monitoring of clinically insignificant disease until intervention is warranted - were developed in response to this issue. The success of this approach is critically dependent on the accurate selection of patients who are predicted to be at the lowest risk of prostate cancer mortality. The Epstein criteria for clinically insignificant prostate cancer were first published in 1994 and have been repeatedly validated for risk-stratification and selection for active surveillance over the past few decades. Current active surveillance programmes use modified criteria with 30-50% of patients receiving treatment at 10 years. Nonetheless, tools for prostate cancer diagnosis have continued to evolve with improvements in biopsy format and targeting, advances in imaging technologies such as multiparametric MRI, and the identification of serum-, tissue- and urine-based biomarkers. These advances have the potential to further improve the identification of men with low-risk disease who can be appropriately managed using active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33623103     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00432-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  75 in total

Review 1.  Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings.

Authors:  Andres Matoso; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Brandon A Mahal; Santino Butler; Idalid Franco; Daniel E Spratt; Timothy R Rebbeck; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Marc A Bjurlin; Joseph Nicholson; Teuvo L Tammela; David F Penson; H Ballentine Carter; Peter Carroll; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Improving Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Health Policy and Biomarkers Beyond PSA.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Heather J Chalfin; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.

Authors:  Leonard P Bokhorst; Riccardo Valdagni; Antti Rannikko; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Tom Pickles; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies.

Authors:  Adil Ouzzane; Raphaele Renard-Penna; François Marliere; Pierre Mozer; Jonathan Olivier; Johann Barkatz; Philippe Puech; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Ballentine H Carter; Anders Bjartell; Michael Seitz; Peter Stanislaus; Francesco Montorsi; Christian G Stief; Fritz Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Validation of the contemporary epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men.

Authors:  Claudio Jeldres; Nazareno Suardi; Jochen Walz; Georg C Hutterer; Sascha Ahyai; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Andreas Erbersdobler; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Active surveillance review: contemporary selection criteria, follow-up, compliance and outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Komisarenko; Lisa J Martin; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The current role of MRI for guiding active surveillance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Olivier Rouvière; Morgan Rouprêt; Roderick van den Bergh; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 16.430

Review 2.  Angioprevention of Urologic Cancers by Plant-Derived Foods.

Authors:  Melissa García-Caballero; José Antonio Torres-Vargas; Ana Dácil Marrero; Beatriz Martínez-Poveda; Miguel Ángel Medina; Ana R Quesada
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Rocco S Flammia; Benedikt Hoeh; Lukas Hohenhorst; Gabriele Sorce; Francesco Chierigo; Andrea Panunzio; Zhe Tian; Fred Saad; Costantino Leonardo; Alberto Briganti; Alessandro Antonelli; Carlo Terrone; Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Anceschi; Markus Graefen; Felix K H Chun; Francesco Montorsi; Michele Gallucci; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Prediction of Grade Reclassification of Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance through the Combination of a Three-miRNA Signature and Selected Clinical Variables.

Authors:  Paolo Gandellini; Chiara Maura Ciniselli; Tiziana Rancati; Cristina Marenghi; Valentina Doldi; Rihan El Bezawy; Mara Lecchi; Melanie Claps; Mario Catanzaro; Barbara Avuzzi; Elisa Campi; Maurizio Colecchia; Fabio Badenchini; Paolo Verderio; Riccardo Valdagni; Nadia Zaffaroni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  On the Road to Accurate Protein Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current Status and Future Advances.

Authors:  Yiwu Yan; Su Yeon Yeon; Chen Qian; Sungyong You; Wei Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.