Literature DB >> 29302237

Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Stephen M Zappala1, Peter T Scardino2,3, David Okrongly4, Vincent Linder5, Yan Dong5.   

Abstract

The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, Woburn, MA) is a blood test utilized prior to a prostate biopsy to determine a patient's risk of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) should the biopsy be performed, thus providing critical information in the clinical management of men with a suspicious prostate-specific antigen value or digital rectal examination result. Multiple US and European clinical studies confirmed that a prebiopsy 4Kscore Test has a high degree of discrimination for a subsequent discovery of high-grade (Gleason score ≥7) PCa. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the 4Kscore Test to discriminate between patients with and without high-grade PCa based on published clinical validation studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the eligible 4Kscore Test clinical validation studies was conducted. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) of the 4Kscore Test as reported from all the studies, and the heterogeneity among these studies were analyzed and repeated for subgroups of the studies. Twelve clinical validation studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising a total of 11,134 patients. The pooled AUC to discriminate for high-grade PCa for all 12 studies was 0.81 (fixed effects 95% CI, 0.80-0.83). Restricting the analysis to the six publications that used the contemporary 4Kscore Test algorithm led to very similar results (AUC 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.83). Heterogeneity was high among all of the 12 studies, as well as among the six publications that used the contemporary 4Kscore Test (Cochrane's Q test, p = 0.001 for both); however, in both cases, after exclusion of a single outlying study with a much lower AUC, heterogeneity was no longer significant (p = 0.08 and p = 0.21). The pooled estimate of 4Kscore Test discrimination (AUC) for high-grade PCa is >0.80, and is consistent across multiple US and European clinical validation studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4Kscore Test; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Early detection; High-grade prostate cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 29302237      PMCID: PMC5737341          DOI: 10.3909/riu0776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  23 in total

1.  Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Andrew Vickers; Melissa Assel; Hans Lilja; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Angel Cronin; Monique Roobol; Caroline Savage; Mari Peltola; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Fritz Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Sanoj Punnen; Daniel D Sjoberg; Scott W Asroff; James L Bailen; James S Cochran; Raoul Concepcion; Richard D David; Kenneth B Deck; Igor Dumbadze; Michael Gambla; Michael S Grable; Ralph J Henderson; Lawrence Karsh; Evan B Krisch; Timothy D Langford; Daniel W Lin; Shawn M McGee; John J Munoz; Christopher M Pieczonka; Kimberley Rieger-Christ; Daniel R Saltzstein; John W Scott; Neal D Shore; Paul R Sieber; Todd M Waldmann; Fredrick N Wolk; Stephen M Zappala
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Monique J Roobol; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Jenny L Donovan; Arnauld Villers; Stephen Zappala; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A Preliminary Study of the Ability of the 4Kscore test, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial-Risk Calculator and the European Research Screening Prostate-Risk Calculator for Predicting High-Grade Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Á Borque-Fernando; L M Esteban-Escaño; J Rubio-Briones; A C Lou-Mercadé; R García-Ruiz; A Tejero-Sánchez; M V Muñoz-Rivero; T Cabañuz-Plo; J Alfaro-Torres; I M Marquina-Ibáñez; S Hakim-Alonso; E Mejía-Urbáez; J Gil-Fabra; P Gil-Martínez; R Ávarez-Alegret; G Sanz; M J Gil-Sanz
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 0.994

7.  A panel of kallikrein markers can predict outcome of prostate biopsy following clinical work-up: an independent validation study from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening, France.

Authors:  Amine Benchikh; Caroline Savage; Angel Cronin; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  A Gupta; M J Roobol; C J Savage; M Peltola; K Pettersson; P T Scardino; A J Vickers; F H Schröder; H Lilja
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core prostate biopsy using four kallikrein markers measured in blood in the ProtecT study.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Mary C Robinson; Rajeev Kumar; Luke Marsden; Michael Davis; Peter T Scardino; Jenny Donovan; David E Neal; Hans Lilja; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  16 in total

1.  Kallikrein markers performance in pretreatment blood to predict early prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis after radical prostatectomy among very high-risk men.

Authors:  Melissa J Assel; Hans David Ulmert; R Jeffery Karnes; Stephen A Boorjian; David W Hillman; Andrew J Vickers; George G Klee; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  The Four-Kallikrein Panel Is Effective in Identifying Aggressive Prostate Cancer in a Multiethnic Population.

Authors:  Burcu F Darst; Alisha Chou; Peggy Wan; Loreall Pooler; Xin Sheng; Emily A Vertosick; David V Conti; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Andrew J Vickers; Hans G Lilja; Christopher A Haiman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Liquid biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer and summary of available data for their use in African-American men.

Authors:  Grant M Henning; Gerald L Andriole; Eric H Kim
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 4.  How should radiologists incorporate non-imaging prostate cancer biomarkers into daily practice?

Authors:  Pawel Rajwa; Jamil Syed; Michael S Leapman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

Review 5.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Prospective validation of microseminoprotein-β added to the 4Kscore in predicting high-grade prostate cancer in an international multicentre cohort.

Authors:  Peter E Lonergan; Emily A Vertosick; Melissa Assel; Daniel D Sjoberg; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Stephen A Boorjian; George G Klee; Matthew R Cooperberg; Kim Pettersson; Erica Routila; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 7.  Promise and Implementation of Proteomic Prostate Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Agnieszka Latosinska; Maria Frantzi; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 8.  Clinical Applications of Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Fernando López-Campos; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Elena Almagro; Esaú Fenández-Pascual; Iván Henríquez; Rebeca Lozano; Estefanía Linares Espinós; Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga; Guillermo de Velasco; Luis Miguel Quintana Franco; Ignacio Rodríguez-Melcón; José López-Torrecilla; Daniel E Spratt; Luis Leonardo Guerrero; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca; Elia Del Cerro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Genome-Based Classification and Therapy of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Arlou Kristina Angeles; Simone Bauer; Leonie Ratz; Sabine M Klauck; Holger Sültmann
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-02

Review 10.  Prostate cancer biology & genomics.

Authors:  Hayley Whitaker; Joseph O Tam; Martin J Connor; Alistair Grey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.