Literature DB >> 12394676

Discrimination of benign from malignant prostatic disease by selective measurements of single chain, intact free prostate specific antigen.

Thomas Steuber1, Paulina Nurmikko, Alexander Haese, Kim Pettersson, Markus Graefen, Peter Hammerer, Hartwig Huland, Hans Lilja.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in serum consists of heterogeneous molecular subforms. Recently we developed an immunoassay for selective measurement of a subfraction of free PSA called intact PSA, which has been shown to be closely associated with prostate cancer. We assessed the ability of serum intact PSA to discriminate between benign and malignant prostatic disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In serum of 178 men with benign disease and 255 men with prostate cancer we measured total PSA and free PSA using a commercially available immunoassay. Intact PSA levels were analyzed by a newly developed assay specific for noncleaved, that is single chain forms of free PSA. Internally cleaved "nicked" PSA was calculated by subtracting intact from free PSA. We also calculated ratios of intact PSA-to-free PSA (intact-to-free PSA) and nicked PSA-to-total PSA (nicked-to-total PSA). We compared means, medians and ranges of all analytes and ratios in patients with and without cancer for the entire total PSA range and in a subset with total PSA ranging from 2 to 10 ng./ml. Furthermore, various combinations of PSA forms were tested for their predictive ability. For statistical comparison we used the Mann-Whitney U test and ROC analysis.
RESULTS: The ratio intact-to-free PSA was significantly higher in cancer (median 48.5%) compared to noncancer cases (median 41.8%, p <0.0001). Conversely, the ratio nicked-to-total PSA was significantly higher in men without compared to those with prostate cancer (median 11.0% and 6.0%, respectively, p <0.0001). Highest discriminative ability was observed for a combination of intact, total and free PSA (log [intact, free, total], AUC = 0.773) followed by nicked-to-total PSA (AUC 0.755). In the subgroup of patients with total PSA levels from 2 to 10 ng./ml. only the AUC of log intact, free, total (AUC 0.706, p = 0.0017) and nicked-to-total PSA (AUC 0.704,p = 0.0019) were significantly larger compared to the AUC of total PSA (AUC 0.602).
CONCLUSIONS: By contrast to measuring crude free PSA concentration, selective determination of specific free PSA subforms, intact PSA and nicked PSA proved to be useful to discriminate men with benign from malignant prostatic disease. These markers may serve to generate specific serum profiles of PSA for improved specificity and early detection of prostate cancer. To translate the encouraging statistical advantage shown in this study into a clinically applicable tool warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394676     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000034388.25218.d9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  Immunoassay for the discrimination of free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) forms with internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆) from fPSA without internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆).

Authors:  Mari T Peltola; Pauliina Niemelä; Kalle Alanen; Martti Nurmi; Hans Lilja; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Finding the Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: The 4Kscore Is a Novel Blood Test That Can Accurately Identify the Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Nicola Pavan; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

3.  Can one blood draw replace transrectal ultrasonography-estimated prostate volume to predict prostate cancer risk?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  PSA, PSA derivatives, proPSA and prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sema Nur Ayyıldız; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

Review 5.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Emerging PSA-based tests to improve screening.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 7.  Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Circulating biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Pauliina Helo; Hans Lilja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Molecular diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo I Canto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.