Literature DB >> 29472826

The Use of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment.

Ashley V Alford1, Joseph M Brito2, Kamlesh K Yadav3, Shalini S Yadav3, Ashutosh K Tewari3, Joseph Renzulli2.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer screening and diagnosis has been guided by prostate-specific antigen levels for the past 25 years, but with the most recent US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendations, as well as concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment, a new wave of prostate cancer biomarkers has recently emerged. These assays allow the testing of urine, serum, or prostate tissue for molecular signs of prostate cancer, and provide information regarding both diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, we discuss 12 commercially available biomarker assays approved for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. The results of clinical validation studies and clinical decision-making studies are presented. This information is designed to assist urologists in making clinical decisions with respect to ordering and interpreting these tests for different patients. There are numerous fluid and biopsy-based genomic tests available for prostate cancer patients that provide the physician and patient with different information about risk of future disease and treatment outcomes. It is important that providers be able to recommend the appropriate test for each individual patient; this decision is based on tissue availability and prognostic information desired. Future studies will continue to emphasize the important role of genomic biomarkers in making individualized treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4Kscore; Apifiny; Biomarkers; ConfirmMDx; Decipher; Michigan Prostate Score; PCA3; PTEN/TMPRSS2:ERG; ProMark; Prolaris; Prostate Health Index; Prostate cancer; SelectMDx

Year:  2017        PMID: 29472826      PMCID: PMC5811879          DOI: 10.3909/riu0772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  102 in total

1.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Gregory P Swanson; Gabrielle Fisher; Arthur R Brothman; Daniel M Berney; Julia E Reid; David Mesher; V O Speights; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jorja D Warren; Jimmy Park; Adib Younus; Darl D Flake; Susanne Wagner; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Steven Stone
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  PCA3 molecular urine test as a predictor of repeat prostate biopsy outcome in men with previous negative biopsies: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Marc C Gittelman; Bernard Hertzman; James Bailen; Thomas Williams; Isaac Koziol; Ralph Jonathan Henderson; Mitchell Efros; Mohamed Bidair; John F Ward
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome in populations at risk: validation in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE trial.

Authors:  Sheila M J Aubin; Jennifer Reid; Mark J Sarno; Amy Blase; Jacqueline Aussie; Harry Rittenhouse; Roger Rittmaster; Gerald L Andriole; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Michael J Duffy; Freddie C Hamdy; Anthony Milford Ward; Julietta Patnick; Christopher P Price; Janet Rimmer; Cathie Sturgeon; Peter White; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Vamsi Parimi; Rajen Goyal; Kate Poropatich; Ximing J Yang
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-12-09

7.  Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Georg Bartsch; Harry G Rittenhouse; Cindy L Evans; Harry J Linton; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Stephen D Mikolajczyk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeffry P Simko; Janet E Cowan; Julia E Reid; Azita Djalilvand; Satish Bhatnagar; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Gregory P Swanson; Steven Stone; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas Erho; Anamaria Crisan; Ismael A Vergara; Anirban P Mitra; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Eric J Bergstralh; Thomas Kollmeyer; Stephanie Fink; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Karla V Ballman; Timothy J Triche; Peter C Black; R Jeffrey Karnes; George Klee; Elai Davicioni; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  23 in total

1.  Assessment of men's risk thresholds to proceed with prostate biopsy for the early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Koo; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Multiparametric MRI Versus SelectMDx Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant PCa in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Giuseppe Dibenedetto; Ludovica Pepe; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  A panel of selected serum protein biomarkers for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jin Song; Shiyong Ma; Lori J Sokoll; Rodrigo V Eguez; Naseruddin Höti; Hui Zhang; Phaedre Mohr; Renu Dua; Dattatraya Patil; Kristen Douglas May; Sierra Williams; Rebecca Arnold; Martin G Sanda; Daniel W Chan; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 4.  Recent advances in prostate cancer research: large-scale genomic analyses reveal novel driver mutations and DNA repair defects.

Authors:  Sander Frank; Peter Nelson; Valeri Vasioukhin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-02

5.  Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Neuhaus; Bo Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21

6.  An expanded biomarker panel for the detection of prostate cancer from urine DNA.

Authors:  Igor Brikun; Deborah Nusskern; Diha Freije
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  CE-MS-based urinary biomarkers to distinguish non-significant from significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Enrique Gomez Gomez; Ana Blanca Pedregosa; José Valero Rosa; Agnieszka Latosinska; Zoran Culig; Axel S Merseburger; Raul M Luque; María José Requena Tapia; Harald Mischak; Julia Carrasco Valiente
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Reference-free transcriptome exploration reveals novel RNAs for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Marina Pinskaya; Zohra Saci; Mélina Gallopin; Marc Gabriel; Ha Tn Nguyen; Virginie Firlej; Marc Descrimes; Audrey Rapinat; David Gentien; Alexandre de la Taille; Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Yves Allory; Daniel Gautheret; Antonin Morillon
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2019-11-15

9.  Oncologic Outcomes after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment: Associations with Pretreatment Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Andreas G Wibmer; Joshua Chaim; Yulia Lakhman; Robert A Lefkowitz; Josip Nincevic; Ines Nikolovski; Evis Sala; Mithat Gonen; Sigrid V Carlsson; Samson W Fine; Michael J Zelefsky; Peter Scardino; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Tissue-Based Biomarkers for the Risk Stratification of Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Michael Tzeng; Patrick J Lewicki; Krishnan Patel; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Siv Venkat; Jonathan E Shoag; Michael A Gorin; Christopher E Barbieri; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.