Literature DB >> 26014575

B1 and T1 mapping of the breast with a reference tissue method.

Federico D Pineda1, Milica Medved1, Xiaobing Fan1, Gregory S Karczmar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a method for mapping the B1 field using a reference signal from a tissue with known T1.
METHODS: Flip angle correction factors were calculated in a region with a known "gold standard" T1; by comparing T1 values from a variable flip angle (VFA) sequence to the "gold standard" and correcting the value of the Ernst angle. The resulting partial B1 map was interpolated for all other regions. In the breast, fat is an ideal reference tissue because its T1 is spatially homogeneous and interpatient variability is low. This method was tested with scans of phantoms and patients (n = 4) on a 3T magnet. The performance of the method was evaluated by comparing the results of VFA T1 mapping with and without B1 correction to inversion recovery (IR) T1 maps.
RESULTS: Phantom data determined that a linear inverse distance weighted interpolation accurately recovered the full B1 map. Use of interpolated maps to correct the VFA data in vivo, reduced the average difference in the T1 of parenchyma between VFA and IR results from 58% to 8%.
CONCLUSION: This proof-of-principle study showed that it is possible to recover a full and accurate map of the B1 field in the breast by using a reference tissue (fat) with an accurately measured T1.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B1 map; T1 mapping; quantitative breast imaging; reference tissue method

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26014575      PMCID: PMC4662654          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  30 in total

1.  A simple and realistic tissue-equivalent breast phantom for MRI.

Authors:  G P Liney; D J Tozer; L W Turnbull
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL.

Authors:  Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Bruce Daniel; Huanzhou Yu; Anne Sawyer-Glover; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Magnetic resonance properties of ex vivo breast tissue at 1.5 T.

Authors:  S J Graham; S Ness; B S Hamilton; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  An in vivo comparison of the DREAM sequence with current RF shim technology.

Authors:  Kay Nehrke; Alois M Sprinkart; Peter Börnert
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging.

Authors:  E K Fram; R J Herfkens; G A Johnson; G H Glover; J P Karis; A Shimakawa; T G Perkins; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Application of a mixed imaging sequence for MR imaging characterization of human breast disease.

Authors:  T E Merchant; G R Thelissen; P W de Graaf; C W Nieuwenhuizen; H C Kievit; W Den Otter
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 9.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic?

Authors:  P A Bottomley; C J Hardy; R E Argersinger; G Allen-Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  13 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3T MR Perfusion of Musculoskeletal Tumours: T1 Value Heterogeneity Assessment and Evaluation of the Influence of T1 Estimation Methods on Quantitative Parameters.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Christophe Leplat; Bailiang Chen; Jacques De Verbizier; Marine Beaumont; Sammy Badr; Anne Cotten; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Authors:  Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-28

3.  Propagation of error from parameter constraints in quantitative MRI: Example application of multiple spin echo T2 mapping.

Authors:  Christopher L Lankford; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on tumor vascular features in needle biopsies.

Authors:  Terisse A Brocato; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Zhihui Wang; Reed G Selwyn; Colin M Wilson; Edward F Wyckoff; Lesley C Lomo; Jennifer L Saline; Anupama Hooda-Nehra; Renata Pasqualini; Wadih Arap; C Jeffrey Brinker; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 5.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Data-driven optimized flip angle selection for T1 estimation from spoiled gradient echo acquisitions.

Authors:  Christina M Lewis; Samuel A Hurley; M Elizabeth Meyerand; Cheng Guan Koay
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Bloch-Siegert B1-Mapping Improves Accuracy and Precision of Longitudinal Relaxation Measurements in the Breast at 3 T.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard D Dortch; William Grissom; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

8.  Estimating B1+ in the breast at 7 T using a generic template.

Authors:  Michael J van Rijssel; Josien P W Pluim; Peter R Luijten; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Dennis W J Klomp
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Influence of B1-Inhomogeneity on Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Bumwoo Park; Byung Se Choi; Yu Sub Sung; Dong-Cheol Woo; Woo Hyun Shim; Kyung Won Kim; Yoon Seok Choi; Sang Joon Pae; Ji-Yeon Suh; Hyungjoon Cho; Jeong Kon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Use of Multiple-Tube Phantom: A Method to Globally Correct Native T1 Relaxation Time Inhomogeneity in Dedicated Molecular Magnetic Resonance Breast Coil.

Authors:  Pradeep Singh Negi; Shashi Bhushan Mehta; Amarnath Jena
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.