Literature DB >> 28426147

Propagation of error from parameter constraints in quantitative MRI: Example application of multiple spin echo T2 mapping.

Christopher L Lankford1,2, Mark D Does1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantitative MRI may require correcting for nuisance parameters which can or must be constrained to independently measured or assumed values. The noise and/or bias in these constraints propagate to fitted parameters. For example, the case of refocusing pulse flip angle constraint in multiple spin echo T2 mapping is explored.
METHODS: An analytical expression for the mean-squared error of a parameter of interest was derived as a function of the accuracy and precision of an independent estimate of a nuisance parameter. The expression was validated by simulations and then used to evaluate the effects of flip angle (θ) constraint on the accuracy and precision of T⁁2 for a variety of multi-echo T2 mapping protocols.
RESULTS: Constraining θ improved T⁁2 precision when the θ-map signal-to-noise ratio was greater than approximately one-half that of the first spin echo image. For many practical scenarios, constrained fitting was calculated to reduce not just the variance but the full mean-squared error of T⁁2, for bias in θ⁁≲6%.
CONCLUSION: The analytical expression derived in this work can be applied to inform experimental design in quantitative MRI. The example application to T2 mapping provided specific cases, depending on θ⁁ accuracy and precision, in which θ⁁ measurement and constraint would be beneficial to T⁁2 variance or mean-squared error. Magn Reson Med 79:673-682, 2018.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B1; MRI; accuracy: T2; precision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28426147      PMCID: PMC5650597          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  51 in total

1.  Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer using an inversion recovery sequence.

Authors:  Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  High-resolution T1 mapping of the brain at 3T with driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 with high-speed incorporation of RF field inhomogeneities (DESPOT1-HIFI).

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  The generating functions formalism for the analysis of spin response to the periodic trains of RF pulses. Echo sequences with arbitrary refocusing angles and resonance offsets.

Authors:  N N Lukzen; M V Petrova; I V Koptyug; A A Savelov; R Z Sagdeev
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Multiecho imaging with suboptimal spoiler gradients.

Authors:  M D Does; R E Snyder
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  B1 mapping for bias-correction in quantitative T1 imaging of the brain at 3T using standard pulse sequences.

Authors:  Mathieu Boudreau; Christine L Tardif; Nikola Stikov; John G Sled; Wayne Lee; G Bruce Pike
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  T2 relaxometry with indirect echo compensation from highly undersampled data.

Authors:  Chuan Huang; Ali Bilgin; Tomoe Barr; Maria I Altbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Errors in T2 estimation using multislice multiple-echo imaging.

Authors:  A P Crawley; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Joint system relaxometry (JSR) and Crámer-Rao lower bound optimization of sequence parameters: A framework for enhanced precision of DESPOT T1 and T2 estimation.

Authors:  Rui Pedro A G Teixeira; Shaihan J Malik; Joseph V Hajnal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Authors:  Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Flexible and efficient optimization of quantitative sequences using automatic differentiation of Bloch simulations.

Authors:  Philip K Lee; Lauren E Watkins; Timothy I Anderson; Guido Buonincontri; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Inferring brain tissue composition and microstructure via MR relaxometry.

Authors:  Mark D Does
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting review part 2: Technique and directions.

Authors:  Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacıoğlu; Yun Jiang; Megan E Poorman; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Kathryn E Keenan; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Myelin water fraction mapping from multiple echo spin echoes and an independent B1 + map.

Authors:  Nima Mehdizadeh; Alan H Wilman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.737

5.  A novel gamma GLM approach to MRI relaxometry comparisons.

Authors:  Rohan Kapre; Junhan Zhou; Xinzhe Li; Laurel Beckett; Angelique Y Louie
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.